Back

Determinants of persistence in sequential effort-based decision-making

Chaigneau, A.; Moretti, R.; Iodice, P.; Pessiglione, M.; Pezzulo, G.

2026-05-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.11.723817 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Goal-directed behavior often requires sustained effort across a sequence of interdependent decisions, yet the determinants of persistence in such contexts remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated how individuals regulate persistence in a novel sequential effort-based task in which they controlled an avatar through successive checkpoints to reach a final goal and could make repeated attempts following failure. At each attempt, participants could choose either to persist in the same task or to disengage toward an easier but less rewarding alternative. We found that decisions to persist or disengage were jointly shaped by multiple interacting factors. Disengagement increased with task difficulty and lower skill level. It also increased with repeated attempts and time-on-task, indexing fatigue, and with accumulated errors, indexing lack of progress. Conversely, proximity to the goal promoted persistence and shaped decision dynamics by reducing choice conflict during persistence decisions and increasing hesitation during disengagement near the goal. Notably, clearing the first checkpoint produced a sharp increase in persistence, suggesting that early success plays a pivotal role. Furthermore, persistence reflected both retrospective and prospective evaluations of effort, with prior investment promoting commitment and anticipated effort reducing it. Finally, disengagement was preceded by short-term performance decline but not by gradual increases in decision conflict, suggesting relatively abrupt strategy shifts following repeated failures. Together, these findings provide a comprehensive account of persistence in sequential effortful tasks, showing that decisions to persist or disengage are jointly shaped by multiple factors related to fatigue, (lack of) progress, goal proximity, and early success.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 24%
8.2%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.2%
5
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
10
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
11
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
14
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
16
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
21
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%