Back

AnnotX: An Edge-powered Laparoscopic Video Annotation Platform

Lafouti, M.; Feldman, L. S.; Hooshiar, A.

2026-05-14 medical education
10.64898/2026.05.11.26352930 medRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate and objective evaluation of surgical skill and performance is critical for advancing training and improving patient outcomes. Current assessment methods increasingly rely on video analytics and depend on labor-intensive, frame-by-frame manual annotation by experts. In this work we developed a surgical video annotation platform (AnnotX) that used a Python backend running a pretrained promptable video segmentation foundation model, i.e., Segment Anything 3 (SAM 3) for per frame segmentation and temporal segment propagation. With a few interactions per class, the model generated a high-quality mask on a key frame and propagated it through the sequence. The platform automatically exported per-class binary masks and color overlays for every frame, together with deterministic metadata and a standardized study folder structure to support auditability and downstream analysis. On deidentified laparoscopic surgery videos, the system processed typical clips in minutes and reduced expert annotation time from hours to minutes without task-specific fine-tuning. We also benchmarked multiple SAM variants (SAM 2, MedSAM 2, and SAM 3) on the CholecSeg8K dataset, and showed AnnotX with a SAM 3 backbone outperformed alternatives. It exhibited a mean IoU of 0.884 and mean Dice of 0.924 across 101 annotated sequences. By being free, practical, and lightweight to deploy, AnnotX aims to accelerate reproducible surgical dataset creation and provides a step toward scalable, video-based performance evaluation in training and quality-improvement settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
15.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
8
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
9
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
13
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
16
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
23
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
26
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%