A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single Ascending Oral Dose Study of Mocravimod: Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Participants
Huntjens, D.; Klingbiel, D.; Hasskarl, J.
Show abstract
Mocravimod (KRP203) is a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator currently in development for patients with haematological malignancies undergoing allogenic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). This first-in-human, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending oral dose study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of mocravimod in 136 healthy adult participants (EudraCT No. 2006-006814-13). Participants received single doses ranging from 0.01 to 40 mg or placebo, with a cohort dedicated to studying food-effect at 3 mg. Mocravimod demonstrated slow absorption (mean Tmax 6-11 hrs), extensive distribution, and a long terminal half-life (91-132 hrs). Exposure increased dose-proportionally for doses [≥]2 mg. The most common adverse events were headache, dizziness, and fatigue, all graded as mild or moderate; no serious adverse events or deaths occurred. Mocravimod-phosphate induced robust, dose-dependent reductions in lymphocyte counts, with significant decreases at doses [≥]2 mg and recovery to baseline observed in all but the highest dose groups. Cardiac effects included transient bradycardia and benign second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block at higher doses, without clinically significant arrhythmias. Food intake had minimal impact on PK. No clinically meaningful changes in pulmonary function or laboratory safety signals were detected. These results indicate that single oral doses of mocravimod up to 40 mg are safe and well tolerated in healthy adults, with predictable PK and expected PD effects. The findings support further clinical development of mocravimod as a targeted immunomodulator in settings such as allogeneic HCT for haematological malignancies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Innovative Randomized Phase 1 Study and Dosing Regimen Selection to Accelerate and Inform Pivotal COVID-19 Trial of Nirmatrelvir 95%
- MTXPK.org: A clinical decision support tool evaluating high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetics to inform post-infusion care and use of glucarpidase 93%
- A user-driven framework for dose selection in pregnancy: proof-of-concept for sertraline 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity of Estimated Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Profile to Inaccurate Assumptions about Dose Timing and Absorption: An Investigation in Real-World and Simulated Data 94%
- Investigation on the interaction between nifedipine and ritonavir containing antivirus regimens: a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis 93%
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dexmedetomidine in Children using Real-World-Data Obtained from Electronic Health Records and Remnant Clinic Samples 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk assessment of drug-induced Long QT Syndrome for some COVID-19 repurposed drugs 94%
- A long-acting GDF15 analog causes robust, sustained weight loss and reduction of food intake in an obese non-human primate model 92%
- A Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Disease with Targeted Delivery of Inhalable Liposomal Hydroxychloroquine: A Non-clinical Pharmacokinetic Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 97%
- Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Inhaled Dry Powder Hydroxychloroquine in Healthy Volunteers 95%
- Spinal cord and brain concentrations of riluzole after oral and intrathecal administration: a potential new treatment route for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.