Back

xNNPCD identifies regulators of programmed cell death by integrating perturbation transcriptomes with cancer dependency profiles

Yin, Q.; Chen, L.

2026-05-13 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.10.724150 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) encompasses multiple regulated processes whose dysregulation shapes cancer fitness, yet current computational studies largely use known PCD genes for prognosis rather than discovering regulators. We developed xNNPCD, an interpretable neural-network framework that links CRISPR-Cas9 perturbation signatures from CMap to gene dependency profiles from DepMap. The model constrains hidden neurons to five PCD pathways and iteratively refines a prior gene-pathway mask matrix derived from GO, KEGG, and Reactome using pathway-neuron ablation. This converts binary gene-pathway relationships into continuous-valued associations and improves dependency prediction over random forests, standard fully connected multi-layer perceptron, and its own non-iterative variant. The learned matrix recovers annotated death regulators and nominates candidate regulators, including RPL23A, HSPA5, SNRPA1, SLC6A2, and ASAH1; combined with dependency scores, it further separates pathway coupling from regulatory direction. Transferring the refined relationship matrix and learned weights to compound-induced perturbation data enables in silico drug screening, identifying BRD-K19103580 and decitabine as targeted therapeutic agents for apoptosis and ferroptosis, respectively. The pathway-resolved drug profiles can facilitate the rational design of combination therapies targeting complementary PCD pathways to overcome single-pathway resistance. Overall, xNNPCD offers a generalizable, interpretable approach for mapping the regulatory landscape and elucidating the molecular processes of PCD in cancer. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=75 SRC="FIGDIR/small/724150v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e74c0forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1326f4corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@291e96org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1970f10_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.0%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.2%
3
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.7%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
13
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
15
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
19
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
23
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%