Back

Astrocyte immunosuppressive activity in glioblastoma depends on ZEB1 and is counteracted by CXCL14

Clement, M.; Gibbs, A.; Begum, A.; Siebzehnrubl, D.; Kaushik, S.; Singh, N.; Gupta, B.; Eftychidis, V.; Siebzehnrubl, F. A.

2026-05-13 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.10.724074 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastomas are incurable and lethal brain cancers. Immunotherapies offer new and promising treatment options for glioblastoma patients, but the highly immunosuppressive nature of these cancers presents a challenging clinical obstacle. Glioblastoma immune evasion is driven by cell-cell interactions in the tumor microenvironment and recent studies have identified astrocytes as important contributors to immune silencing [1, 2]. Cell plasticity is a key feature of reactive astrocytes that drives heterogeneous, pro- or anti-inflammatory states [3], but the molecular regulators of astrocyte-immune interactions remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigate whether cell plasticity of glioblastoma-associated astrocytes promotes or opposes tumor progression and show that loss of astrocyte plasticity results in T-cell recruitment and immune activation. We evaluate how astrocytic cell plasticity contributes to immune functions in the glioblastoma microenvironment using single cell sequencing from preclinical models, in vivo genetic perturbations and in vitro mouse and human experimental systems. We show that astrocytes surrounding glioblastoma express the stem cell-associated transcription factor, ZEB1, and that conditional-inducible astrocytic deletion of Zeb1 remarkably reduces glioblastoma growth and extends survival. Increased recruitment and activation of T cells in astrocytic Zeb1-deficient mouse models is linked to increased expression of the immunoattractant cytokine CXCL14, and viral delivery of CXCL14 in experimental glioblastoma models increases survival. Our data support that CXCL14 is a candidate therapeutic target for reprogramming the tumor microenvironment that can restrict and reduce glioblastoma growth and progression.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
17.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.0%
3
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
5
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.2%
7
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
8
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
22
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%