Back

Tuning into the city soundscape: Optimizing Convolutional Neural Networks for avian acoustic identification in the neotropics and evaluating their performance against established monitoring approaches.

Ardila-Villamizar, M.; De Clippele, L. H.; Dominoni, D. M.

2026-05-13 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.10.724049 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have become increasingly prominent in biodiversity monitoring due to their strong performance in accurately detecting species from sound recordings, overcoming some limitations of traditional methods such as point-counts. Yet, their use in urban ecosystems remains limited, highlighting the need for frameworks that identify modelling strategies to optimize their performance in these complex soundscapes. Here, we evaluated how preprocessing and labelling strategies, detection thresholds, sample size, and architecture affect the performance of CNNs for bird identification in urban tropical ecosystems. We also assessed its potential by comparing CNN-derived biodiversity estimates with those from point-counts and acoustic indices. For this, we used one week of recordings collected along urbanization gradients in five Colombian Andes cities to developed 11 multiclass CNN models varying in spectral representation, labelling strategies, training data source and backbone architecture. The best-performing model, evaluated with F1-scores, combined Log-Mel spectrograms, multispecies labels, ecosystem-specific recordings, a probability threshold of 0.3 and a ConvNeXt backbone with its performance generally improving with sample size. Although CNNs and point counts detected partially distinct assemblages, CNN-derived species richness was comparable to that estimated from point-counts. In addition, the Normalized Difference Soundscape Index (NDSI) was positively associated with richness, suggesting its potential as a biodiversity proxy in tropical urban soundscapes. Overall, by identifying effective modelling designs and monitoring strategies, our study advances the development of robust biodiversity assessment frameworks in urbanized ecosystems in the Neotropics whilst also providing methodological guidance for future research and practical insights for wildlife monitoring and conservation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.8%
2
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.1%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
8
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.3%
10
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
11
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
12
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
18
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
19
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%