Back

The chloroplast CLPD chaperone: consequences of under- and overexpression, interaction with the CLP protease core, and candidate substrates

Annis, M. Y.; Routray, P.; Bhuiyan, N. H.; Yuan, B.; van wijk, k. J.

2026-05-13 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.10.723991 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Expression of the chloroplast AAA+ chaperone CLPD gene increases during senescence and drought, but its functional role in chloroplast proteostasis is poorly understood. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of Arabidopsis CLPD protein accumulation across development from early seedlings to senescence, and compares results to its homologs CLPC1,2, as well as CLPB3 and cpHSP90. The developmental consequences of complete loss of CLPD expression (clpd-1), as well as overexpression of functional CLPD or CLPD impaired in ATP hydrolysis (CLPD-TRAP), were determined in Arabidopsis. clpd-1 has accelerated seedling development while functional CLPD overexpression lines, but not CLPD-TRAP, have delayed development. To determine if CLPD is a bona fide CLP chaperone associating with the CLPPRT protease and to identify in vivo candidate substrates, we employed the CLPD-TRAP line during the vegetative and flowering (senescent) growth stages. Affinity purification of CLPD-TRAP followed by mass spectrometry showed high enrichment of the CLP protease complex, thus providing direct support for the role of CLPD in substrate delivery to the CLP protease. CLPC1,2 were also highly enriched in the CLPD-TRAP interactome, suggesting hetero-oligomerization and cooperation between the three chaperones is likely. Nine chloroplast candidate substrates were identified in the CLPD-interactomes, including: FHY2 involved in riboflavin synthesis, THI1 and THIC involved in thiamin metabolism, and four proteins of unknown function. Several of these have been previously identified as potential CLPC1 substrates; however, others appear to be specific to CLPD. CLPD acts in substrate selection within a heteromeric CLPC-CLPD hexamer, likely to make unique contributions through its divergent N-terminus.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.5%
2
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
16.4%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
13.5%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.9%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
7
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.4%
13
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
23
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%