Back

Controlled intramural fluid injection to quantify propensity to thoracic aortic dissection

Cavinato, C.; Pierrat, B.; Ban, E.; Simon, M.; Humphrey, J. D.

2026-05-13 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.10.721415 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dissection of the thoracic aorta includes delamination of medial lamellae and permeation of blood within the media. Quantifying how biaxial loading of a vulnerable wall and fluid mechanics interact to drive dissection remains a central challenge. Here we combine controlled distension-extension testing of intact porcine descending thoracic aortas with forced intramural fluid injection to investigate how axial stretch, injection rate, and needle gauge modulate the initiation and propagation of intramural delamination. Across experiments, injection pressure-volume curves exhibited nonlinear responses characterized by pressure peaks followed by stepwise pressure drops, suggesting progressive micro-delamination events within the medial lamellar networks. Increasing axial stretch significantly elevated peak injection pressure and promoted preferential axial propagation of the permeation / delamination front. Higher injection rates induced abrupt lamellar separation and larger dissected areas, whereas smaller needle gauges generated higher upstream pressures due to increased hydraulic resistance. Synchrotron imaging revealed the microstructural transition from intralamellar fluid permeation and wall swelling to the formation of a large fluid-filled delamination cavity. These results support a mechanistic framework in which the introduction of pressurized fluid within the aortic media behaves as a hydraulic fracture process in a layered poroelastic tissue, governed by balance across fluid pressurization, wall loading, and interlamellar strength. The findings provide quantitative insight into the biomechanical conditions that contribute to the initiation and propagation of aortic dissection.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.4%
3
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
7
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
9
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.3%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
17
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
19
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
24
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
25
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%