Single-cell and spatial profiling of cysteine cathepsins identifies tumor states relevant to antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer
Cwilichowska-Puslecka, N.; Malek-Chudzik, N.; Gorzen, O.; Puslecki, T.; Mlost, J.; Nguyen, J.; Dolega-Kozierowski, B.; Kasprzak, P.; Sopel, M.; Groborz, K.; Szynglarewicz, B.; Matkowski, R.; Poreba, M.
Show abstract
Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease shaped by dynamic interactions between malignant cells, immune infiltrates, stromal compartments, and the extracellular matrix. Among the molecular regulators of these interactions, cysteine cathepsins and legumain have emerged as important proteases involved in tissue remodeling, immune regulation, and tumor progression, yet their distribution and functional status across human breast cancer ecosystems remain insufficiently defined. Here, we performed an integrated protease-centric analysis of breast cancer specimens from 66 patients using high-dimensional single-cell mass cytometry of matched peripheral blood and tumor samples, imaging mass cytometry of intact tissues, and activity-based TOF probes for in situ detection of active proteases. Systemic immune profiling identified two patient clusters associated primarily with neoadjuvant therapy and tumor grade, accompanied by distinct cytokine and circulating protease patterns. In tumors, single-cell analysis revealed pronounced interpatient heterogeneity in tissue architecture and immune infiltration, while protease profiling uncovered reproducible cell type-associated modules, including cathepsin B/L-cystatin C and legumain-cystatin E/M axes. Cathepsins B and L were prominent in tumor-infiltrating immune cells and variably expressed in epithelial cells, whereas cathepsin D showed broader tumor distribution and cathepsin S remained more restricted. In epithelial cells, HER2 expression did not consistently coincide with high cathepsin B or L abundance, enabling identification of a limited subgroup of patients with combined HER2-high/protease-high states relevant to protease-cleavable antibody-drug conjugates. Spatial imaging further localized cathepsins B and D to tumor-stroma interfaces and macrophage-rich niches, and activity-based IMC confirmed the presence of catalytically active cathepsin B in human breast tumor tissue. Together, these findings define cysteine cathepsins as spatially and cellularly organized components of breast tumor ecosystems and provide a framework for protease-informed patient stratification and biomarker-protease pairing in targeted therapy.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 95%
- The breast pre-cancer atlas illustrates the molecular and micro-environmental diversity of ductal carcinoma in situ 95%
- Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergies with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative spatial omics reveals distinct tumor-promoting multicellular niches and immunosuppressive mechanisms in Black American and White American patients with TNBC 96%
- Multiplexed RNA-FISH-guided Laser Capture Microdissection RNA Sequencing Improves Breast Cancer Molecular Subtyping, Prognostic Classification, and Predicts Response to Antibody Drug Conjugates 96%
- Anti-CSF-1R therapy with combined immuno- chemotherapy coordinate an adaptive immune response to eliminate macrophage enriched Triple Negative Breast Cancers 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeting EIF4A triggers an interferon response to synergize with chemotherapy and suppress triple-negative breast cancer 96%
- Active Surveillance Characterizes Human Intratumoral T Cell Exhaustion 95%
- A Multiomic Analysis Reveals How Breast Cancers Disseminated to the Bone Marrow Acquire Aggressive Phenotypes through Tumor-Stroma Tunnels 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.