Back

Cave-dwelling Planariidae in Croatia exhibit differing levels of cave trait evolution

Kauf, L.; Vila-Farre, M.; Ficze-Schmidt, F.; Bakula, E.; Rink, J.; Bilandzija, H.

2026-05-13 zoology
10.64898/2026.05.09.723976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Dinaric karst of Croatia encompasses a network of over 10,000 caves and represents one of the worlds most important subterranean biodiversity hotspots. It is inhabited by remarkably diverse and often endemic species, including planarian flatworms, which are among the rarest macroinvertebrates encountered in cave habitats. Although the presence of cave planarians has long been known, no integrative research on this group has been conducted to date, and the evolutionary relationships between these animals and their surface water counterparts are currently unresolved. To address these gaps, we combined field sampling, phylogenetic analysis based on COI and 18S genes, and phenotypic characterization. Our results show that cave planariids in Croatia belong to at least three genera and are more widespread and diverse across both Croatia, and the broader Dinaric karst, than previously assumed. We increased the number of cave records in the Dinaric karst from 26 to 37 and documented cf. Atrioplanaria and Phagocata in Croatian caves for the first time. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest numerous independent cave colonization events, including multiple instances within the genera Crenobia and cf. Atrioplanaria. Variation in pigmentation and eye reduction, both within and between populations, further reveal heterogeneous evolutionary trajectories of cave-associated phenotypes. The biogeographical patterns and high genetic diversity we report here point to a complex evolutionary history of planariids in the Dinarides. Our newly generated molecular phylogenies and systematic documentation of trait variability establish Planariidae as a valuable model for studying mechanisms underlying convergent evolution of pigment loss and eye reduction in cave environments.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.8%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.9%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
6
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.3%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
20
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%