Back

Remote underwater photographs reveal environmental correlations and patterns in reef manta ray habitat use in Laamu Atoll, Maldives

Guilford-Pearce, B. J.; Staiger, M.; Stevens, G. M. W.; Doherty, P. D.; Ali, J.

2026-05-13 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.09.723939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reef manta rays (Mobula alfredi) are threatened by fishing and other anthropogenic threats. Which, when coupled with conservative life history traits, have made this species vulnerable to extinction. Spatiotemporal ecological knowledge, such as site fidelity and visitation patterns to key aggregation sites, are imperative for effective conservation management of M. alfredi. A novel method of environmental sensing, remote underwater photo systems (RUPs), was employed to understand drivers of M. alfredi habitat use and resighting patterns. RUPs were deployed at four cleaning sites around Laamu Atoll, Maldives. Between March 2021 and May 2023, 455,458 photos were analysed. Generalised linear models revealed increases in M. alfredi presence in response to high chlorophyll-a concentrations, low illumination moon states, the Southwest Monsoon, and in the morning, while human presence had no effect. Branchial spot patterns allowed for 81 M. alfredi individuals to be identified, from 629 sightings, representing 51.59% of Laamu Atolls previously identified population (n = 157). Cleaning stations are visited more intensively during periods of increased productivity of the Southwest Monsoon, likely in response to greater foraging opportunities near the study areas. Additionally, moon state, used as a proxy for tidal strength, was associated with increased visitation during new moon periods, suggesting that weaker tidal states may facilitate presence. These data support integrating RUPs with observational surveys to improve inferences about habitat use and our understanding of cleaning sites frequented by M. alfredi. This study aims to inform the implementation of Laamu Atolls first marine protected area management plan.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
21.9%
2
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
6
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
11
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
13
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%