Back

Genomic, Clinical, and Spatial Predictors of Durable Response to BRAF/MEK Inhibition in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma

Shi, Y.; Savchenko, A.; Brase, J. C.; Reardon, B.; Ricker, C. A.; Park, J.; Tarantino, G.; Manos, M. P.; Huang, A. Y.; Van Allen, E. M.; Garraway, L. A.; Flaherty, K. T.; Liu, D.

2026-05-15 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.05.09.721157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BRAF-targeted therapy (BRAFi/MEKi) and immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4) have transformed the treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. While most patients who respond to targeted therapy eventually progress, a subset derives durable benefit, and biomarkers to identify this subset would inform optimal treatment selection. In this study, we analyzed pre-treatment tumor samples from a clinically annotated cohort of 155 patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma treated with first-line BRAFi/MEKi and followed for up to five years. We stratified patients into durable responders (PFS [&ge;] 24 months) and rapid progressors (PFS < 6 months with progression) and found that a global metric of tumor genomic heterogeneity, rather than individual gene alterations, distinguished these groups. Combining genomic heterogeneity with baseline tumor burden (e.g., lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) or radiographic lesion dimensions), we developed a parsimonious model that predicted durable responders with high precision and specificity. Notably, the analogous population of patients treated instead with immunotherapy were not durable responders, suggesting that the selected predictors of durable responders are targeted therapy specific. Spatial profiling of a subset of pre-treatment biopsies (n = 47) demonstrated that high intratumoral, but not peritumoral, CD8+ T-cell infiltration correlated with prolonged survival on BRAF-targeted therapy and served as an independent predictive factor when considered with genomic heterogeneity and features of clinical tumor burden. Together, these findings highlight the distinct baseline intrinsic and extrinsic features underlying durable response to BRAF-targeted therapy and support their potential implication in guiding treatment selection for patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. One-Sentence SummaryIntegrated clinical, tumor genomic, and immune microenvironmental features predict durable responses to BRAF-targeted therapy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
3
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
5
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.2%
7
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.5%
10
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
13
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
14
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
18
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
21
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
24
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%