Back

In vivo base editing via single myotrophic adeno-associated viruses in dystrophic mouse muscle and satellite cells

Lin, K.-H.; Lam, A.; Ooijen, S.; Maier, M.; Kassis, G.; Ellis, R.; Messemer, K.; Martin, J.; Khairallah, R.; Wagers, A. J.

2026-05-10 cell biology
10.64898/2026.05.09.721064 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is the most common, lethal X-linked neuromuscular disorder of childhood and is caused by mutations in the Dmd gene that disrupt dystrophin expression. Although adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapies hold tremendous promise for DMD treatment, their clinical applications have been limited by dose-dependent vector and genome-level toxicities. Here, we developed and tested a single-vector adenine base editing strategy as a potentially safer genome editing approach to recode the pathogenic nonsense mutation into a benign missense mutation in mdx4cvDMD mouse model. Delivered using a muscle-tropic adeno-associated virus (MyoAAV) at a clinically-feasible dose (4E13 VG/kg), this strategy enabled detectable molecular recoding of the mdx4cv mutation in mice ranging in age from 3 days to 6 months. Yet, the overall efficiency and therapeutic impact of in vivo base editing with this system was highest in mice treated at the juvenile stage, with animals administered MyoAAV vectors at 3 weeks of age showing robust recovery of dystrophin expression and significant improvement in muscle contractile properties only one month later. Notably, introduction of adenine base editors either earlier in development, in neonatal mice, or later, in adulthood, yielded substantially lower editing efficiencies, particularly in muscle satellite cells whose editing is essential to ensure durable rescue of dystrophin expression in growing and regenerating muscle. Taken together, these results demonstrate the therapeutic potential of single-vector adenine base editing for DMD and underscore the importance of recipient age and disease stage in achieving optimal treatment outcomes for this and other genetic muscle disorders.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.4%
2
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.6%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.6%
6
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
11
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
12
NAR Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
21
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 47%
0.7%
23
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
24
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%