Back

On the evolution, function and cellular fate of Neurospora crassa ACW-1 and NCW-3, proteins with different cell wall interaction mechanism

Ramirez-Pelayo, A. S.; Callejas-Negrete, O. A.; Amaya-Delgado, L.; Verdin, J.

2026-05-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.09.718313 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The fungal cell wall is populated by proteins (CWPs), mostly uncharacterized, that show an atypical evolutionary behavior. Most CWPs are glycosylphosphatidylinositol(GPI)-proteins, followed by proteins with internal repeats (PIR), and non-covalently attached proteins that harbor carbohydrate binding domains (CBM). Several structural CWPs are initially bound to the same wall carbohydrates, but either covalently or non-covalently. However, it is not clear whether they work in the same way and if they are subjected to the same evolutionary constraints. In Neurospora crassa, CWPs ACW-1 (NCU08936) and NCW-3 (NCU07817) bind to {beta}-1,3-glucans through a GPI anchor or a predicted CBM-52 domain, respectively. Here, the evolutionary trajectories and functional roles of both CWPs were analyzed. Both proteins localized primarily to distal septa and hyphal wall surfaces. Morphological characterization and stress cell wall assays suggested that both proteins contribute to cell wall integrity, but NCW-3 likely plays a more prominent role. ACW-1 and NCW-3 homologues were predominantly identified in Ascomycota. ACW-1 displayed a broader distribution than NCW-3, whose homologues were largely restricted to Sordariales. Despite these differences, both protein families exhibited similar moderate global conservation and signatures of purifying selection within shared taxa. Nevertheless, a divergence gradient was identified within ACW-1, related to its tandem leucine-rich repeat (LRR) regions. A similar local accumulation of evolutionary change was not observed within NCW-3. These findings suggested that distinct CWP architectures can accommodate different patterns of sequence diversification despite sharing similar global evolutionary change.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.4%
3
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
13
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
21
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
25
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.7%
29
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Molecular Microbiology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%