Back

Estimation of Physiological Metrics from Resting ECGs Using Deep Learning in the UK Biobank, Including submaximal exercise derived VO2max, Body Fat Percentage, and Grip Strength

Mankowski, I.; Pinter, E.; Lee, I.-M.; Raetsch, G.; Demler, O.

2026-05-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.09.26352818 medRxiv
Show abstract

Maximal oxygen consumption [Formula] is the gold standard for cardiorespiratory fitness but requires resource-intensive physical testing. Recent reports show that machine learning models can extract additional information from ECGs, yet the potential of ECG as a source of physiological metrics remains underutilized. While routinely collected resting electrocardiograms (ECG) provide an opportunistic window into cardiorespiratory fitness, current deep learning models often struggle with cross-cohort transferability or remain dependent on active exercise data. We developed population specific models using the UK Biobank to estimate submaximal exercise derived [Formula](N = 8,540) and a panel of other physiological metrics (sample sizes up to N = 78,265) from resting 12-lead ECGs using Patient Contrastive Learning of Representations (PCLR), an AI based tool that converts ECG into a set of 320 features (ECG-PCLR). Data were split 80%:20% (training:test) and models were evaluated on a set-aside test subset. We demonstrate that ECG-PCLR embeddings alone can estimate submaximal [Formula] and body fat percentage with Pearson correlations (r) of 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. They also estimate systolic blood pressure, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and grip strength with r values from 0.31 to 0.55. Adding ECG embeddings to basic predictors (age, sex and BMI) improves submaximal [Formula] prediction by an absolute {Delta}R2 of 8% and by 1% to 13% for other physiologic parameters.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
2
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.4%
5
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.1%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
12
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.9%
18
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
29
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%