Back

Estimation of Physiological Metrics from Resting ECGs Using Deep Learning in the UK Biobank, Including submaximal exercise derived VO2max, Body Fat Percentage, and Grip Strength

Mankowski, I.; Pinter, E.; Lee, I.-M.; Raetsch, G.; Demler, O.

2026-05-13 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.09.26352818 medRxiv
Show abstract

Maximal oxygen consumption [Formula] is the gold standard for cardiorespiratory fitness but requires resource-intensive physical testing. Recent reports show that machine learning models can extract additional information from ECGs, yet the potential of ECG as a source of physiological metrics remains underutilized. While routinely collected resting electrocardiograms (ECG) provide an opportunistic window into cardiorespiratory fitness, current deep learning models often struggle with cross-cohort transferability or remain dependent on active exercise data. We developed population specific models using the UK Biobank to estimate submaximal exercise derived [Formula](N = 8,540) and a panel of other physiological metrics (sample sizes up to N = 78,265) from resting 12-lead ECGs using Patient Contrastive Learning of Representations (PCLR), an AI based tool that converts ECG into a set of 320 features (ECG-PCLR). Data were split 80%:20% (training:test) and models were evaluated on a set-aside test subset. We demonstrate that ECG-PCLR embeddings alone can estimate submaximal [Formula] and body fat percentage with Pearson correlations (r) of 0.61 and 0.65, respectively. They also estimate systolic blood pressure, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and grip strength with r values from 0.31 to 0.55. Adding ECG embeddings to basic predictors (age, sex and BMI) improves submaximal [Formula] prediction by an absolute {Delta}R2 of 8% and by 1% to 13% for other physiologic parameters.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.