Back

Contactless ultrasound chest vibration mapping discriminates respiratory and cardiac patients from healthy individuals.

SALOUX, E.; DEMORE, L.; WINTZENRIETH, F.; HODZIC, A.; MOUADIL, A.; SHEKARNABI, M.; ZEMNISKIY, A. V.; MENDELS-FLANDRE, P.; BAYAT, S.; FINK, M.; KIRI ING, R.; COUADE, M.; SIMILOWSKI, T.

2026-05-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.09.26352804 medRxiv
Show abstract

Contactless assessment of cardiopulmonary function remains an unmet need, with current approaches relying either on subjective clinical examination or on resource-intensive imaging. We evaluated a novel multipoint airborne ultrasound surface motion camera (SMC) designed to map thoracic vibration patterns without contact and to extract clinically relevant information through data-driven analysis. In a prospective observational study, clinically characterised participants underwent short-duration acquisitions during natural breathing and externally induced oscillations. The resulting signals were transformed into spatially and frequency-resolved maps and analysed using machine learning models to discriminate healthy individuals from patients with respiratory or cardiac disease. The approach proved feasible in a clinical setting and achieved excellent discrimination between healthy individuals and respiratory patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.90 {+/-} 0.07), including in patients with subtle abnormalities not detected by pulmonary function testing. Discrimination between healthy individuals and cardiac patients ranged from acceptable to excellent (AUC 0.76-0.90 depending on subgroup), with the highest performance observed in aortic stenosis. Model interpretability analyses revealed spatial and spectral patterns consistent with the known physiological organisation of lung mechanics and cardiac auscultation areas, supporting a structure-function relationship between recorded signals and underlying processes. These findings indicate that thoracic vibration transmission encodes spatially and spectrally organised information that can be captured without contact and exploited through explainable data-driven modelling. While the results require confirmation in larger populations, this approach may represent an operator-independent, low-burden extension of bedside assessment, with potential applications in early detection, triage, and monitoring of cardiopulmonary disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.9%
2
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
4
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.8%
6
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
27
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
30
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%