Back

Contactless ultrasound chest vibration mapping discriminates respiratory and cardiac patients from healthy individuals.

SALOUX, E.; DEMORE, L.; WINTZENRIETH, F.; HODZIC, A.; MOUADIL, A.; SHEKARNABI, M.; ZEMNISKIY, A. V.; MENDELS-FLANDRE, P.; BAYAT, S.; FINK, M.; KIRI ING, R.; COUADE, M.; SIMILOWSKI, T.

2026-05-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.09.26352804 medRxiv
Show abstract

Contactless assessment of cardiopulmonary function remains an unmet need, with current approaches relying either on subjective clinical examination or on resource-intensive imaging. We evaluated a novel multipoint airborne ultrasound surface motion camera (SMC) designed to map thoracic vibration patterns without contact and to extract clinically relevant information through data-driven analysis. In a prospective observational study, clinically characterised participants underwent short-duration acquisitions during natural breathing and externally induced oscillations. The resulting signals were transformed into spatially and frequency-resolved maps and analysed using machine learning models to discriminate healthy individuals from patients with respiratory or cardiac disease. The approach proved feasible in a clinical setting and achieved excellent discrimination between healthy individuals and respiratory patients (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.90 {+/-} 0.07), including in patients with subtle abnormalities not detected by pulmonary function testing. Discrimination between healthy individuals and cardiac patients ranged from acceptable to excellent (AUC 0.76-0.90 depending on subgroup), with the highest performance observed in aortic stenosis. Model interpretability analyses revealed spatial and spectral patterns consistent with the known physiological organisation of lung mechanics and cardiac auscultation areas, supporting a structure-function relationship between recorded signals and underlying processes. These findings indicate that thoracic vibration transmission encodes spatially and spectrally organised information that can be captured without contact and exploited through explainable data-driven modelling. While the results require confirmation in larger populations, this approach may represent an operator-independent, low-burden extension of bedside assessment, with potential applications in early detection, triage, and monitoring of cardiopulmonary disease.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.5%
3
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
6
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
8
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
11
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
15
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
21
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
25
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
28
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
29
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
30
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%