Back

Predicting curvature evolution on biological surfaces from clinical imaging-derived area dilation: a closed-form interpretable framework

Khabaz, K.; Davis, C.; Pugar, J.; Pocivavsek, L.

2026-05-12 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.08.723930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Curvature evolution on a deforming surface is governed by the full change in the surface metric, but on biological surfaces captured by serial three-dimensional imaging, only the local area change is observable. The loss of the shear component leaves prediction of curvature evolution underdetermined from imaging alone. On the thoracic aorta, where curvature change marks disease progression, we derive a closed-form equation that predicts the change in integrated Gaussian curvature from the area dilation and initial geometry. The equation combines a conformal term in the area dilation with a leading anisotropy correction from the initial geometry. These two analytic levels, augmented by multi-scale spatial features at neighboring regions and a graph neural network trained on residuals, form a four-level nested predictor. On a synthetic aortic geometry under prescribed isotropic expansion, the equation recovers the analytic coefficient exactly. Across a continuum from pure expansion to pure shear, it holds R2 [≥] 0.71. On 236 paired thoracic aortic surfaces spanning dissection, aneurysm, traumatic injury, and non-pathologic controls, the equation recovers within-surface curvature change patterns with per-patient median Pearson [Formula] and pooled R2 = +0.238 [+0.225, +0.250], matching the graph neural network on the same inputs. The residual is a direct measurement of how far the observed growth field departs from conformality. HighlightsO_LIClosed-form equation predicts aortic curvature change from paired computed tomography scans. C_LIO_LIRecovers analytic predictions exactly on synthetic aortic geometries. C_LIO_LIAnisotropy proxy holds R2 [≥] 0.71 from pure expansion to pure shear. C_LIO_LICoefficients tie to geometric mechanisms ensuring interpretability. C_LIO_LIAnisotropy term, computable from one CT, is twice as large on diseased aortas. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
18.4%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.4%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
12
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
15
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.9%
19
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
25
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
30
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%