Back

Conformational Diversity and Substrate Specificity are Decoupled in Ancestral and Extant Glucokinases

Freye, C.; Miller, B. G.

2026-05-11 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.08.723840 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multi-functionality in extant enzymes, including the ability to transform multiple substrates, is thought to arise, in part, from conformational flexibility. The hexokinase protein family represents a classic model system for investigating the relationship between substrate specificity and conformational change. Within this family, human glucokinase (hGCK) displays notable degrees of conformational heterogeneity, including an intrinsically disordered loop. The extent to which these structural features contribute to the breadth of hGCKs substrate scope is unknown. Here, we investigate the substrate specificities of extant and ancestral glucokinases that span the evolutionary emergence of conformational heterogeneity in this family. We show that extant hGCK catalyzes the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of glucose, 2-deoxyglucose, mannose, glucosamine, fructose, allose and galactose with catalytic efficiencies ranging from 6.3 x 103 M-1 sec-1 to 0.33 M-1sec-1. A glucokinase ancestor from early vertebrate evolution (vGCK), which also displays conformational heterogeneity and disorder, phosphorylates these same seven substrates with similar kcat/Km values. An antecedent, chordate glucokinase (cGCK), which displays reduced conformational heterogeneity and lacks intrinsic disorder, also transforms these same substrates, but with higher overall catalytic efficiencies and markedly lower Km values. Notably, however, the ratios of kcat/Km values for individual substrate pairs, which define specificity, are unchanged for all three enzymes. Our results demonstrate that substrate specificity is not correlated with conformational diversity in GCKs and support a model in which the differences in catalytic efficiencies of various substrates arise from differences in the ability to form the ground state enzyme-carbohydrate binary complex.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.9%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.6%
4
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.9%
6
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Biochemical Journal
80 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.7%
21
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
23
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%