Back

Validation of an AI-Powered Automated Colony Analysis Platform Across Eight ISO Microbiological Methods: A Multi-Pathogen, Multi-Matrix Performance Study

Upfold, J. K.; van de Schoor, A.; Elvebakken, H. F.; Petersen, O.; Elvebakken, C. F.; Kustner, C.; Madsen, M.

2026-05-09 microbiology
10.64898/2026.05.08.723721 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Manual colony counting remains the rate-limiting, operator-dependent step in culture-based food microbiology quality control (QC). Automated colony analysis using machine learning (ML) offers the potential to standardise, accelerate, and improve the traceability of this process. However, systematic multi-method validation data for AI-based platforms against recognised international standards remain scarce. We conducted a prospective, multi-study validation of the Reshape Smart Incubator which is an automated imaging and ML-based colony analysis system, across eight ISO microbiological reference methods. In total, 887 plates were analysed, spanning qualitative (presence/absence) detection of Listeria spp. (ISO 11290-1) and Salmonella spp. (ISO 6579), and quantitative enumeration of total viable count (ISO 4833), Bacillus cereus (ISO 7932), Enterobacteriaceae (ISO 21528), coagulase-positive Staphylococci (ISO 6888), yeasts and moulds (ISO 21527), and lactic acid bacteria (ISO 15214). Automated results were benchmarked against the consensus of three or more trained technicians. The platform achieved 100% agreement with manual assessment for all both qualitative detection methods (ISO 11290-1, ISO 6579) with zero false positives and zero false negatives. For quantitative enumeration, agreement ranged from 92.97% (ISO 15214, n=122, using ISO-aligned {+/-}10%/>30 CFU thresholds) to 98.46% (ISO 21528, n=130). Where discrepancies occurred, they largely coincided with plates showing high inter-technician variability. Precision testing demonstrated a coefficient of variation of 5.88% and a mean standard deviation of 0.44 CFU for low-count plates. This study presents a comprehensive multi-ISO validation of an AI-based colony analysis system to date. The AI models demonstrated performance comparable to or exceeding that of trained human technicians across a broad range of microbiological targets, agar types, and colony morphologies, thereby supporting their use as a validated and traceable alternative to manual plate reading in accredited food microbiology quality control laboratories.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
10
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
12
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
30
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%