Back

Testing the null model for polyandry: the need to breed explains multiple mating and constrains trading-up

McCorquodale, D. S.; Berson, J. D.; Dugand, R. J.; LeBas, N. R.; Tomkins, J. L.

2026-05-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.08.723703 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In most species, unmated individuals run the risk of dying with zero fitness. This strong selection on virgin females to mate may also explain why females subsequently remate, despite fitness costs; all that is required is a genetic correlation between virgin and non-virgin mating propensity. Despite being the null model for the evolution and maintenance of polyandry, this hypothesis has received no empirical test. We performed separate quantitative genetic and artificial selection experiments to test the presence of this cross-context genetic correlation in the cow-pea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus. A quantitative genetic experiment did not find evidence of the hypothesised genetic correlation. However, after 13 generations of artificial selection on virgin mating latency, we found strong evidence for evolutionary divergence in remating latency. Females from lines selected for longer virgin mating latency took approximately twice as long to remate and, were less polyandrous if their virgin mating latency was longer. There was no evidence that females could mate indiscriminately and then trade-up, rather, trading up could only occur if virgin discrimination was present. Selection against virgin death will thus constrain both the evolution of non-virgin discrimination and trading up, increasing rates of polyandry. These findings reveal a genetic correlation between virgin and non-virgin latency to mate suggesting that polyandry may be maintained because of the need to breed.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
14
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.1%
16
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
21
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
23
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%