Back

Wolves in black: multiple introgressions and natural selection may explain melanism in Italian wolves

Fabbri, G.; Battilani, D.; Mattucci, F.; Galaverni, M.; Stronen, A. V.; Musiani, M.; Godinho, R.; Lobo, D.; Scandura, M.; Randi, E.; Fabbri, E.; Caniglia, R.

2026-05-09 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.08.723698 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hybridisation between wild and domestic taxa can favour the spread of domestic alleles into wild populations through backcrossing. The complex interplay of random genetic drift, recombination, and selection can shape the fate of introgressed alleles. Maladaptive domestic variants are likely to be purged by natural selection, but others may persist across generations. It has long been known that the Apennine Italian wolf population, exposed to large numbers of free-ranging dogs, has experienced extensive introgression. The unusually high frequency of black wolves observed in Italy, compared to other European populations, may parallel patterns documented in North American wolves, where the melanistic KB allele at the CBD103 gene, of domestic origin, has spread over thousands of years of introgression. We tested whether the KB mutation entered the peninsular Italian wolf population via hybridisation and spread through adaptive introgression. Genome-wide analyses of black and wild-type (grey-coated) Apennine wolves showed no clear signatures of recent dog ancestry in most melanistic animals. Our ancestry reconstruction approaches identified two distinct KB haplogroups of domestic origin, suggesting multiple introgression events. Notably, we found molecular evidence consistent with balancing selection on the KB haplotypes, whose functional role, nonetheless, warrants further research. Therefore, the microevolutionary genomic and ecological consequences of wolf-dog hybridisation in Italy should be carefully investigated to inform appropriate science-based conservation management strategies.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.4%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.2%
3
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.2%
7
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.4%
10
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
16
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
18
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
27
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%