Back

Molecular Methods to Detect Vibrio cholerae and Associated Bacteriophages among Diarrheal Patients in Bangladesh

Sriguha, I.; Mu, M.; Sayeed, M. A.; Cato, E. T.; Creasy-Marrazzo, A.; Islam, K.; Khabir, M. I. U.; Bhuiyan, M. T. R.; Begum, Y. A.; Islam, M. T.; Khan, Z. H.; Freeman, E.; Vustepalli, A.; Brinkley, L.; Brown, D. G.; Pouchnik, D. J.; Mi, K.; Lin, Z.; Grembi, J. A.; Leung, D.; Qadri, F.; Khan, A. I.; Nelson, E. J.

2026-05-13 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352758 medRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular diagnostics to detect Vibrio cholerae (Vc) may be negatively impacted by pathogen-specific lytic bacteriophage (phage) predation. To address this problem, phage detection as a proxy for pathogen detection has been proposed. However, efforts to modernize cholera diagnostics with molecular tools require addressing knowledge gaps on best practices to detect Vc and associated bacteriophages. We conducted polymerase chain reaction (PCR), quantitative PCR (qPCR), and nano-liter (nl) qPCR targeting Vc and known phages (ICP1/2/3) on stool samples collected from patients admitted at hospitals across Bangladesh. Of 4,975 patients enrolled, 2,574 diarrheal samples were collected and over 65,000 reactions were conducted, including replicates. We analyzed the results for target-specific assay alignment and then used machine learning to determine the effect of phage predation on Vc-assay alignment. Standard curve analyses were used to set qPCR-positivity thresholds at 7.3x105 CFU/mL for Vc and 1.7x103, 9.3x103, and 3.0x105 PFU/mL for ICP1, ICP2, and ICP3, respectively. Among 2,462 samples assayed by qPCR, target detection was 25.3% (623), 7.8% (193), 0.5% (13), and 5.8% (144) for Vc, ICP1, ICP2, and ICP3, respectively. There was strong alignment between assays for Vc detection ({kappa}=0.785) and moderate alignment for phage detection ({kappa}=0.609, 0.593, and 0.533 for ICP1/2/3, respectively). Phages were ranked as the first (ICP1) and third (ICP3) effectors of Vc diagnostic alignment. These findings provide insights on how to prioritize molecular methods in the cholera field as well as related less tractable diseases facing similar diagnostic challenges. IMPORTANCEThis paper presents a comprehensive comparison of molecular methods to detect Vibrio cholerae (Vc) and associated bacteriophage (phage) which can be used as a proxy for pathogen detection. This initiative is an important step towards modernizing cholera diagnostics with molecular tools. In this study, we found that quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) represents a reasonable approach to detect Vc and associated phages balancing assay performance, cost, and accessibility. A key additional finding was that phage predation was found to be a leading factor that impacts the alignment of molecular methods to detect Vc. While we recommend qPCR be added to the cholera diagnostic toolkit, the effects of phage predation need to be accounted for in the development and evaluation of cholera diagnostics. These findings have applicability to less tractable disease where diagnostics share similar vulnerabilities.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.7%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.5%
4
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
5
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
8
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
10
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Journal of Virological Methods
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
26
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%