Back

Development of a Deep Learning Model Integrating CT Images and Blood Data for the Diagnosis of Acute Cholecystitis

HORAGUCHI, T.; Nomura, R.; Sakai, S. A.; Saito, N.; Kurihara, K.; Ohira, M.; Takaha, R.; Mitsui, N.; Yokoi, R.; Hatanaka, Y.; Hayashi, H.; Kuno, M.; Fukada, M.; Sato, Y.; Yasufuku, I.; Asai, R.; Bando, H.; Yamashita, R.; Matsuhashi, N.

2026-05-12 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352724 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeIn this study, we aimed to develop and evaluate an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis (AC) using non-contrast CT images and clinical data. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 199 patients (100 AC, 99 non-AC) treated between January 2016 and December 2025 at a single center. Patients were randomly divided into training (n=139) and test (n=60) datasets. Three models were constructed: an imaging-based deep learning model, a clinical data-based machine learning model, and a hybrid machine learning model integrating deep learning-derived imaging features with clinical data. CT images were preprocessed, and gallbladder regions were segmented. Clinical variables included white blood cell counts and levels of C-reactive protein and liver function markers. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, specificity, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Statistical comparisons were performed using Welchs t-test and Chi-square test. ResultsThe imaging-based model achieved accuracy 0.883, precision 0.848, recall 0.933, specificity 0.833, and AUC 0.916. The blood-based model achieved accuracy 0.917, precision 0.931, recall 0.900, specificity 0.933, and AUC 0.949. The hybrid model showed the highest performance, with accuracy 0.950, precision 0.909, recall 1.000, specificity 0.900, F1 score 0.952, and AUC 0.986. ConclusionA hybrid model integrating CT imaging and clinical data improved diagnostic performance for AC compared with single-modality models.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.6%
4
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
5
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
7
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
18
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
22
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%