Back

Pre-bed and nighttime screen use, beyond daily total, is inversely associated with sleep quality: a longitudinal study of 350,600 nights

Gupta, K.; Dhawale, N.; Shanmugam, A.; Narasimhan, V.

2026-05-12 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352708 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sleep is fundamental to metabolic regulation, cognitive performance, immune function, and cardiovascular health, and evening screen exposure is widely proposed as a behavioural contributor whose adult evidence base remains thin. Here we analyze 350,600 paired screen-day and following-night observations from 3,086 Ultrahuman Ring AIR adult users. Sleep quality was assessed via the rings composite sleep score, derived from heart-rate variability, nightly movement, and skin temperature. At the user level, users in the highest screen-time quintile had lower sleep scores (Cohens d = -0.30), shorter sleep duration (d = -0.25), and lower sleep efficiency (d = -0.14) than the lowest screen-time quintile (all q [&le;] 0.005). Further, 45+ min of screen use in the last hour before bed was associated with mean sleep scores at the bottom of the cohort range, whereas the same dose 4-5 hours earlier showed no detectable cost, so the timing of screen use, not just its total, mattered. We next asked whether the way users distribute their screen time across the 24 hours, independent of total dose, separates users by sleep outcome. K-means clustering on 24-hour screen-use profiles identified three phenotypes: Daytime Peakers (DP), Late-Night Users (LNU), and Round-the-Clock Users (RCU), distinguished primarily by their nighttime share of 24-h screen use (DP 8.2%, LNU 16.9%, RCU 29.3%). Despite comparable total daily screen time, the phenotype gap in mean sleep score between DP (75.2 {+/-} 0.3 SEM) and RCU (66.7 {+/-} 0.6) was 8.5 points. We further identified users who transitioned phenotypes across four sequential quarters of follow-up; in this longitudinal subcohort, the magnitude of sleep-score change tracked the magnitude of the behavioural shift, with DP [-&gt;] LNU transitioners declining by 5.16 {+/-} 0.94 points and LNU [-&gt;] RCU transitioners by 4.79 {+/-} 1.87 points (both p < 0.05). Together, these findings position the temporal distribution of screen use, alongside its daily total and its concentration immediately before bed, as a behavioural correlate of objectively measured sleep quality in adults.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
Sleep Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.8%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
5
Journal of Sleep Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.6%
6
Journal of Psychopharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.1%
10
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
11
Sleep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.1%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
15
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
16
Obesity
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
19
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
22
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Journal of Biological Rhythms
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%