Back

Pre-bed and nighttime screen use, beyond daily total, is inversely associated with sleep quality: a longitudinal study of 350,600 nights

Gupta, K.; Dhawale, N.; Shanmugam, A.; Narasimhan, V.

2026-05-12 public and global health
10.64898/2026.05.08.26352708 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sleep is fundamental to metabolic regulation, cognitive performance, immune function, and cardiovascular health, and evening screen exposure is widely proposed as a behavioural contributor whose adult evidence base remains thin. Here we analyze 350,600 paired screen-day and following-night observations from 3,086 Ultrahuman Ring AIR adult users. Sleep quality was assessed via the rings composite sleep score, derived from heart-rate variability, nightly movement, and skin temperature. At the user level, users in the highest screen-time quintile had lower sleep scores (Cohens d = -0.30), shorter sleep duration (d = -0.25), and lower sleep efficiency (d = -0.14) than the lowest screen-time quintile (all q [&le;] 0.005). Further, 45+ min of screen use in the last hour before bed was associated with mean sleep scores at the bottom of the cohort range, whereas the same dose 4-5 hours earlier showed no detectable cost, so the timing of screen use, not just its total, mattered. We next asked whether the way users distribute their screen time across the 24 hours, independent of total dose, separates users by sleep outcome. K-means clustering on 24-hour screen-use profiles identified three phenotypes: Daytime Peakers (DP), Late-Night Users (LNU), and Round-the-Clock Users (RCU), distinguished primarily by their nighttime share of 24-h screen use (DP 8.2%, LNU 16.9%, RCU 29.3%). Despite comparable total daily screen time, the phenotype gap in mean sleep score between DP (75.2 {+/-} 0.3 SEM) and RCU (66.7 {+/-} 0.6) was 8.5 points. We further identified users who transitioned phenotypes across four sequential quarters of follow-up; in this longitudinal subcohort, the magnitude of sleep-score change tracked the magnitude of the behavioural shift, with DP [-&gt;] LNU transitioners declining by 5.16 {+/-} 0.94 points and LNU [-&gt;] RCU transitioners by 4.79 {+/-} 1.87 points (both p < 0.05). Together, these findings position the temporal distribution of screen use, alongside its daily total and its concentration immediately before bed, as a behavioural correlate of objectively measured sleep quality in adults.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
17.3%
2
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.6%
8
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
11
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
14
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
18
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
21
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
28
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%