Back

Study protocol for preoperative classification using integrated screening and short-course neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngioma (the PRECISE-PCP study): a prospective single-arm study

Ye, Z.; Wu, G.; Jiang, H.; Gu, X.; Huang, R.; Wang, Y.; Qiao, N.; Ma, Z.; Ye, Z.; Wu, Y.; Wang, W.; Cheng, H.; Chen, H.; Ye, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Guan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Q.

2026-05-12 oncology
10.64898/2026.05.08.26351826 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCraniopharyngioma (CP) comprises two distinct histological subtypes, adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) and papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP), which are often challenging to distinguish preoperatively. Approximately 95% of PCP harbor the BRAF V600E mutation, whereas ACP lacks this alteration, making PCP uniquely sensitive to BRAF and MEK inhibition. However, in the absence of a reliable preoperative classification strategy, targeted therapy has been limited to recurrent disease or to cases with histological confirmation. This study aims to describe and prospectively evaluate a pragmatic preoperative classification strategy and short-course neoadjuvant BRAF and MEK inhibition followed by surgery in newly diagnosed, preoperatively classified PCP. Methods and analysisThis is a prospective, single-arm, open-label study. Patients with newly diagnosed craniopharyngioma will be screened using an integrated preoperative strategy combining imaging-based prediction and selective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell-free DNA testing for BRAF V600E in indeterminate cases. Twelve participants preoperatively predicted as PCP and BRAF V600E positive will receive dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg once daily for up to three 28-day cycles, followed by transnasal endoscopic surgery. Assessments are scheduled at days 7, 14, 28, 56, and 84 until surgery. The primary endpoint is objective response rate, assessed by contrast-enhanced MRI using RANO 2.0 criteria. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, local disease control, endocrine outcomes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axes, visual and cognitive outcomes, postoperative diabetes insipidus, surgical complexity, and concordance between the preoperative classification strategy and postoperative pathology and BRAF V600E status. Exploratory analyses will evaluate treatment-related changes in tumor vascularity, tissue characteristics, and post-treatment molecular alterations in tumor tissue. Ethics and disseminationThis protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University (KY2024-028). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences. Trial registration numberChiCTR2400081636 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_ST_ABSStrengthC_ST_ABS[tpltrtarr] This study proposes an integrated, clinically applicable preoperative strategy that combines imaging-based prediction with selective cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA analysis to identify papillary craniopharyngioma (PCP) prior to surgery. [tpltrtarr]It prospectively evaluates short-course neoadjuvant BRAF and MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed PCP, addressing a clinically relevant gap in current management. [tpltrtarr]Standardized, multidimensional assessments are performed across the neoadjuvant, perioperative, and early postoperative periods, capturing radiographic, surgical, endocrine, visual, and cognitive outcomes. Limitation[tpltrtarr] The single-arm, open-label design without a surgical control group limits direct comparison with upfront surgery. [tpltrtarr]Despite the integrated prediction strategy, preoperative misclassification cannot be excluded entirely.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.8%
3
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
6
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
12
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
15
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
24
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%