Back

Digital assessment of real-world physical activity in Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Brehm, S.; Fiengo Tanaka, L.; Majeed, Y.; Barnikel, M.; Le Roux, C.; Ghiani, A.; Jansen, C.-P.; Jaeger, S. U.

2026-05-12 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.05.08.26351469 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe assessment of daily-life physical activity (DLPA) using wearables in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) can provide information on real-world function, potentially enhancing the evaluation of disease progression. Research QuestionWhat is the existing evidence on sensor-based DLPA assessment in patients with PH and its quality? Study Design and MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to January 13, 2026, extracting data on devices, DLPA outcomes, and associations with clinical outcomes. We obtained pooled estimates through random-effects models and assessed evidence quality using a customized tool. ResultsWe identified 33 studies (29 adult, 4 pediatric) including 1,257 patients mainly with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), followed by chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), and only rarely with PH due to lung diseases and/or hypoxia. Participants were predominantly female, WHO functional class II-III. Most studies investigated step count and time spent in different physical activity levels, but showed substantial heterogeneity in devices and their utilization. The meta-estimate was 4,811 daily steps. A moderate positive correlation was found between daily step count and six-minute walking distance (6MWD) (r=0.59, 95%CI 0.47-0.69); a weak positive correlation was found between time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and 6MWD (r=0.38; 95% CI 0.26-0.49). Inconsistent wear-time definition, non-wear reporting and temporal misalignment of DLPA may compromise validity and comparability. InterpretationWearable-based DLPA assessment in PH is feasible, though high-quality evidence remains scarce. Future research should standardize procedures, terminology, and reporting of DLPA outcomes. Concordance with established measures such as the 6MWD, and their ability to predict clinical outcomes and disease progression need to be demonstrated.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
5
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
9
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%