Back

Insights from nine nights of self-applied, low-density sleep EEG during sleep restriction therapy: a proof-of-concept evaluation

Stanyer, E. C.; Le Roux, M.; Sharman, R.; Ribeiro Pereira, S. I.; Davidson, S. M.; Tarassenko, L.; Espie, C. A.; Kyle, S. D.

2026-05-15 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.05.08.26348885 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: Self-applied, low-density EEG offers opportunities to examine sleep in the home environment, yet its feasibility during behavioural sleep interventions remains unexplored. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a self-applied, low-density EEG device during sleep restriction therapy (SRT) and explore effects on sleep and affect. Methods: Seventeen adults with insomnia and depressive symptoms completed a 2-week baseline and 4 weeks of SRT. The primary outcome was the proportion of expected EEG recordings completed and scoreable. Secondary outcomes included clinical measures, sleep continuity (sleep diary, actigraphy), sleep architecture (low-density EEG for 9 nights), power spectral density, and affect. Data were analysed with linear mixed models. Cohen's d and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Results: Feasibility was demonstrated (92% of expected EEG nights completed). SRT was associated with reductions in insomnia severity, depressive symptoms, negative affect, and increases in positive affect. Robust improvements were observed across treatment in sleep continuity (SOL, WASO, SE) from diary, which were paralleled by actigraphy. EEG revealed reduced TIB, TST, N1, N2, REM sleep, and REM latency during week one. Reductions in EEG-derived TIB and N1 sleep were maintained at night 28. There were no reliable differences for spectral or spindle measures. Conclusions: These findings suggest that self-applied, low-density EEG during SRT is feasible, acceptable, and may capture sleep changes during treatment. They highlight the potential for multi-night monitoring of sleep interventions at home and elucidating mechanisms underlying therapeutic change.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
6
Journal of Biological Rhythms
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
11
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
13
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
26
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
29
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%