Back

Probabilistic Cardiac Digital Twins for Robust Patient-Specific Modeling

Giovanis, D. G.; Zhang, K.; Tso, J.; Maggioni, M.; Kevrekidis, I. G.; Trayanova, N.

2026-05-12 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.07.723610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) in computational heart models is essential for reliable cardiac digital twins (DTs) in personalized medicine, yet remains challenging. Traditional Monte Carlo and stochastic Galerkin methods often become impractical in the high-dimensional, nonlinear state variable and parameter spaces of cardiac electrophysiology and mechanics. This article introduces a framework for learning a joint probability density over cardiac observables and model parameters, enabling the characterization of statistical dependencies across a large number of variables in patient-specific cardiac DTs. By sampling from this density and conditioning on available data, useful predictive distributions can be constructed, allowing uncertainty to be propagated through the model and quantified in terms of variability. Conditional regression can then be performed directly on this learned density, enabling systematic exploration of interdependencies among observables for both predictive inference and model design. The statistical methodology adopts a geometry-aware generative learning framework, recently introduced by the authors, that decouples the learning of data geometry from sampling. First it identifies a low-dimensional latent representation that captures the intrinsic structure of the data and its multiscale geometric features. A stochastic differential equation is then formulated directly in the low-dimensional latent space to generate samples efficiently; these are subsequently mapped back to the high-dimensional space of cardiac states and parameters through a smooth lifting operator. We demonstrate the approach on a ventricular arrhythmia prediction benchmark, where the learned joint probability density enables the construction of predictive distributions over key parameters (e.g., conductivities, fibrosis patterns) through sampling and conditioning. This enables uncertainty to be propagated and quantified through sampling and conditioning on the learned joint density, with substantially fewer model evaluations than conventional UQ methods.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.4%
2
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
13
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
16
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
18
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
20
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
25
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
29
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%