Back

Multi-locus metabarcoding and intensive sampling reveal extraordinary diversity carried in the ballast water of a single vessel

Brown, S.; Carney, K. J.; Pagenkopp Lohan, K. M.; Holzer, K. K.; Pilgrim, E. M.; Ruiz, G. M.; Darling, J.

2026-05-11 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.07.723533 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding risks of biological invasions associated with ballast water (BW) requires full understanding of the biodiversity transported in ballast tanks. Here we characterize the remarkable level of diversity that can be carried in the BW of a single vessel. To maximize our ability to capture BW diversity we: 1) utilized DNA-based methods to describe biodiversity, including both native and non-native taxa; 2) exploited multiple primer sets targeting multiple genomic loci with different expectations for taxonomic coverage; 3) assessed multiple tanks on a single vessel to capture different communities present in different tanks; and 4) sampled those tanks with far higher-than-usual replication both to improve representation of the diversity present and to enable statistical estimation of total richness. Using this approach, we found extraordinarily high diversity associated with a single vessel. Across all loci, we estimate a total of 272 taxa that can be assigned species names; looking more broadly at unnamed molecular operational taxonomic units, our estimates are between 425 and 742 individual taxa, depending on the locus. We confirm that only a fraction of this diversity would be captured with typical sampling efforts. We found that different loci capture different snapshots of biodiversity and that our ability to detect taxa of interest (e.g., non-native species) depends on sampling effort and genomic locus. Our results expand upon previous studies describing highly diverse BW communities and add to a growing literature that demonstrates the value of molecular methods for characterizing those communities and assessing the associated risk of non-native species introduction.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
3
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.2%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
7
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
12
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
13
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
23
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
24
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
26
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
28
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
30
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%