Back

Natural variation in male frequency fails to predict inbreeding responses in Caenorhabditis elegans

Sosa, J.; Abraham, S.; Blanco, G.; Olivera, J.; Alonso, I.; Fierst, J. L.; Kapila, R.

2026-05-11 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.05.07.723510 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In androdioecious species like Caenorhabditis elegans, where the primary mode of reproduction is self-fertilization, the evolutionary role of males has long puzzled biologists. One proposed benefit of males is the potential to escape inbreeding depression. We tested this by enforcing seven generations of inbreeding across nine C. elegans strains differing in baseline male frequency and measuring competitive relative fitness before and after inbreeding. We then relaxed inbreeding for four generations to assess recovery. We predicted that strains with higher male frequency, and greater opportunity for outcrossing, would exhibit faster recovery once inbreeding was relaxed. Strains varied substantially in their responses with most showing significant fitness declines and partial recovery but neither the magnitude of inbreeding depression nor the extent of recovery correlated with male frequency. These results show that male frequency is a poor predictor of inbreeding responses and does not reliably reflect realized outcrossing or its fitness consequences.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.5%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.9%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
10
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
12
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
15
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
19
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
21
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%