Back

CRISPR-PTM and CRISPR-VEIS: Multiplexed platforms for quantitative functional analysis of endogenous phosphosites

Willaume, S.; Benada, J.; Akopyan, K.; Petrosius, V.; Thatte, J. V.; Miller, T. C. R.; Lindqvist, A.; Sorensen, C. S.

2026-05-09 cell biology
10.64898/2026.05.07.723463 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Connecting protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) to phenotypic outcomes is a central challenge. Although phosphoproteomics has richly catalogued specific sites, reliable methods to measure the endogenous effects of individual phosphosites on cellular fitness and signaling are still lacking. Here, we introduce CRISPR-PTM and CRISPR-VEIS as complementary platforms for quantitative, endogenous phosphosite interrogation at both individual and clustered phosphorylation events. CRISPR-PTM is a multiplexed knock-in framework generating defined phosphosite variants with internal allelic markers, enabling precise relative fitness effects in pooled populations. CRISPR-VEIS (Visualisation of Edits In Situ) is an in situ mRNA-genotyping approach that directly links endogenous allelic edits to single-cell phenotypes, addressing needs for subclonal isolation or exogenous reporters. We applied these methods to the WEE1-CDK1 regulatory pathway, where canonical CDK1-Y15 phosphorylation alone cannot explain WEE1 loss or inhibition phenotypes. CRISPR-PTM systematically quantified fitness consequences of CDK1 phosphosite variants and identified Y19 as a previously unrecognized WEE1-dependent inhibitory site. Single non-phosphorylatable substitutions at Y15 or Y19 had minimal impact, but combined CDK1-Y15F/Y19F editing caused pronounced fitness defects, phenocopying WEE1 inactivation and showing epistasis to WEE1 inhibitors. CRISPR-VEIS further demonstrated that acute endogenous editing of both sites correlated with elevated CDK activity at the single-cell level. Together, CRISPR-PTM and CRISPR-VEIS provide broadly applicable approaches for quantitative analysis of PTM function, enabling direct linkage of endogenous phosphosite variation to cellular fitness and signaling phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
16.9%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
13.9%
3
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
4
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
6
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.8%
8
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.1%
10
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
11
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
14
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.3%
15
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
17
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
20
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%