Back

A mechanistic framework for photon-to-carbon efficiency: coupling photosynthetic energy supply and light respiration in microalgae

Cogne, G.; Legrand, J.; Dussap, C.-G.

2026-05-11 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.05.07.723413 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Photon-to-biomass conversion efficiency in oxygenic phototrophs can vary widely under controlled cultivation, yet its mechanistic origin remains difficult to resolve at the system level. Here, we combine a quantified description of light attenuation and primary photochemistry with a thermodynamically constrained metabolic framework to relate reactor-scale light forcing to intracellular energetics in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chemostats. In a near-optimal regime, the specific growth rate scales linearly with an effective photochemical input, {phi}{gamma}, defined as the rate of photochemically productive photon absorption. This identifies a physiologically relevant forcing variable at the timescale of growth and an invariant biomass yield on productive photons. Imposing this experimentally grounded constraint reveals a compatible effective energetic coupling within photosynthetic electron transport and strongly restricts the admissible photosynthesis-respiration balance. A two-dimensional growth map in the space of photochemical forcing and respiratory activity reveals a respiration-limited region and a dissipative regime in which excessive respiration lowers photon-use efficiency. Analysis of feasible sub-optimal states identifies a small set of intracellular dissipative motifs. Among them, concomitant operation of the Calvin-Benson cycle and the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway emerges as a parsimonious reaction-level mechanism for dissipative carbon recycling. Overall, the results provide an experimentally anchored framework linking productive light absorption, energetic coupling, and light respiration to photon-yield losses in a controlled phototrophic system.

Published in Biochemical Engineering Journal · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.