Back

Life's Essential 8 and Incident Cardiovascular Disease: Validation Using Real World Data from Consumer Devices in the All of Us Research Program

Tremblay, J. O.; Annis, J.; Master, H.; Cakar, A.; Coleman, P.; Full, K. M.; Ruderfer, D.; Elfassy, T.; Brittain, E.

2026-05-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352702 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Lifes Essential 8 (LE8) metric is a well-validated tool to assess cardiovascular health. The tool relies on self-reported physical activity (PA) and sleep data which may be subject to recall bias when compared with objective device-derived data. We used objectively captured device data from Fitbit devices linked to the electronic health record (EHR) from the All of Us Research Program (AoURP) to examine the association between LE8 and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). MethodsWe analyzed AoURP participants with [≥]6 months of Fitbit-derived PA and sleep data from 2009 to 2023. Remaining LE8 components were obtained via EHR and combined with Fitbit components to calculate LE8 scores. Cox proportional hazards models analyzed the association between LE8 scores and a composite CVD outcome (myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, and peripheral artery disease). Relative explained variation (REV) assessed the contribution of each LE8 component to model performance. We modeled the impact of plausible changes in weekly activity and sleep on the composite CVD outcome. Results11,542 participants were included (50.1 years [IQR: 35.9, 61.7], 74% female, 81% white) with a median monitoring duration of 4.48 years [2.00, 6.87]. The median LE8 score was 68.1 [60.6, 74.4]. Higher LE8 score was linearly associated with lower CVD risk (HR = 0.74; CI, 0.69-0.80) per 10-point increase. Risk of MI, CAD, HF, PAD, and stroke showed similar independent associations with LE8 scores. Among LE8 components, physical activity had the highest median REV 0.35 [0.21, 0.47], followed by blood pressure (0.23, CI = 0.11-0.36) and blood glucose (0.14, CI = 0.05-0.24). Increasing weekly moderate to vigorous physical activity by 30 minutes (120min to 150min) decreased the risk of incident CVD by 23% (HR=0.77; CI, 0.721-0.81), and increasing sleep duration from 4-5 hours to 7-9 hours decreased the risk of incident CVD by 35% (HR=0.65; CI, 0.50-0.84). ConclusionThese results underscore the potential of calculating the LE8 score using objective PA and sleep data from consumer devices and highlight the disproportionate impact of lifestyle behaviors on CVD risk among patients seeking care. Consumer wearable devices offer valuable information when included in cardiovascular risk assessment.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
23.3%
2
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
3
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.0%
13
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
16
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
18
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
25
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
28
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%