Back

Sustainable Health Innovation for Global Health Equity: Solar-Powered MRI for Affordable Healthcare in Resource-Limited Settings

Papasavva, M.; Abate, G. B.; Piper, J.; Kahari, C.; Tavengwa, N. V. B.; Mazhanga, C.; Chidhanguro, D.; Mutero, A.; Musiiwa, L.; Giampietro, V.; Twumasi, R.; Clemensson, P.; Bennallick, C.; Deoni, S.; Nyachowe, C.; Ntozini, R.; Williams, S. C. R.; Prendergast, A. J.; Bourke, N. J.

2026-05-10 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352684 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is central to neurological care, yet access remains profoundly inequitable in low- and middle-income countries, especially in rural health facilities where high costs and fragile electricity supply limit services. Ultra-low-field (ULF) portable MRI offers a way to expand access, but deployment in weak-grid settings requires robust affordable power. We characterized the power needs of a 0.064T portable ULF MRI system and assessed the feasibility of a solar-powered MRI-capable facility in a rural Zimbabwean clinic, which we believe to be the first of its kind in the world. MethodsWe measured the power draw of an ultra-low-field MRI session from a portable photovoltaic (PV) battery kit in the UK, quantifying scan, standby and energy use. We then monitored a PV-battery micro-grid supplying a protected circuit at an MRI-capable clinic in Shurugwi, Zimbabwe. Inverter telemetry was used to derive PV generation, load, battery state of charge (SoC) and grid import for working days in October-November 2025, spanning the end of the dry season and onset of the rainy season. ResultsIn the portable configuration, a 64-minute MRI session consumed [~]0.21 kWh, with standby demand of [~]1.44 kWh per 24 hours. In clinic, mean PV generation was 9.10 kWh (SD=1.34) and load 9.91 kWh, with zero recorded grid import and minimum daily SoC typically [≥]60%, including during the early rainy season. ConclusionAn affordable PV-battery micro-grid can reliably support ULF MRI and associated research power loads in a rural, weak-grid clinic, offering a reproducible blueprint to narrow diagnostic equity gaps in resource-limited settings.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.7%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
5
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
7
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
15
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%