Back

SARS CoV 2 Associated Shifts in the Upper Respiratory Tract Mycobiome in Non Hospitalized Cases

Tomar, S. S.; Khairnar, K.

2026-05-10 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352639 medRxiv
Show abstract

SARS{square}CoV{square}2 infection is associated with marked changes of the upper respiratory tract mycobiome. URT mycobiome Changes in non-hospitalized patients however, remains poorly defined. We performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing of 95 upper respiratory tract swab samples from 48 symptomatic SARS{square}CoV{square}2-positive individuals and 47 healthy controls from central India. Fungal diversity and community structure were compared using alpha- and beta-diversity analyses, while differential taxa were identified using prevalence-based testing and LEfSe. SARS{square}CoV{square}2-positive samples showed significantly higher fungal alpha diversity than controls, with increased Shannon diversity (p = 0.000319) and Simpson diversity (p = 0.017). Beta-diversity analysis showed significant separation between groups for both Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances (PERMANOVA p = 0.001), with significant dispersion effects as well (PERMDISP p = 0.001). Differential analysis identified more SARS{square}CoV{square}2-enriched than control-enriched taxa, including Candida orthopsilosis, Malassezia furfur, M. sympodialis, M. globosa, Aspergillus niger, A. terreus, and A. nidulans. Aspergillus sydowii was the main control-enriched taxon. LEfSe and concordant multi-test analysis supported these findings, and sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness across thresholds. Certain SARS{square}CoV{square}2-enriched taxa were linked to confirmed or probable COVID{square}19-associated fungal infections, whereas no such pathogens were detected in controls. These findings indicate that SARS{square}CoV{square}2 infection is associated with URT mycobiome dysbiosis and enrichment of clinically relevant opportunistic fungi in community cases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.