Back

Imaging-detected benign breast findings in a forensic autopsy cohort unselected for breast symptoms: descriptive results from the Sisyphus study

Sidiropoulou, Z.; Santos, C.

2026-05-12 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352434 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale and ObjectivesPublished estimates of benign breast disease (BBD) are derived mainly from clinical, surgical, screening-recall, or reduction-mammoplasty series. Forensic autopsy cohorts can reduce referral and symptom-selection bias, although they are not necessarily representative of the whole living population. We describe imaging-detected benign breast findings in the Sisyphus forensic autopsy cohort. Materials and MethodsConsecutive medico-legal autopsies of individuals aged 40 years or older were prospectively evaluated over a multi-year period at a medico-legal autopsy service in Portugal. Bilateral breast specimens obtained by subcutaneous modified radical mastectomy were examined with specimen digital mammography and ultrasonography. Findings were classified according to BI-RADS terminology. Lesions requiring tissue diagnosis in the post-mortem protocol underwent wire-guided or direct excisional biopsy. Female cadavers were analysed as the primary cohort; male cadavers were analysed separately as an exploratory subgroup. Proportions are reported with exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsThe cohort included 291 cadavers: 217 women and 74 men. Among female breast specimens, 236/434 were BI-RADS 1 (54.4%; 95% CI, 49.6-59.1), 189/434 were BI-RADS 2 (43.5%; 95% CI, 38.8-48.4), and 8/434 were protocol-sampled suspicious findings (1.8%; 95% CI, 0.8-3.6). At the cadaver level, 99/217 women had at least one benign imaging finding (45.6%; 95% CI, 38.9-52.5). Mammographic benign findings were present in 91/217 women (41.9%; 95% CI, 35.3-48.8), dominated by calcifications; ultrasonographic benign findings were present in 51/217 (23.5%; 95% CI, 18.0-29.7), most often simple cysts and duct ectasia. Plasma cell mastitis-pattern calcifications were observed in 8/217 women (3.7%; 95% CI, 1.6-7.1). Male benign findings were less frequent (9/74, 12.2%; 95% CI, 5.7-21.8) and were dominated by benign lymph-node variants. All nine protocol-sampled lesions were benign at histology. Clinical breast examination identified 5/8 protocol-sampled female lesions (62.5%; 95% CI, 24.5-91.5). ConclusionIn this forensic autopsy cohort unselected for breast symptoms, benign imaging findings were common in women aged 40 years or older and less frequent in men. The results provide descriptive post-mortem imaging reference data, but lesion-specific estimates, especially rare entities, should be interpreted with caution because of small numerators, the older age profile, limited clinical history, and the original cancer-focused design of the Sisyphus study.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.5%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.5%
5
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
8
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
12
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
30
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%