Back

Imaging-detected benign breast findings in a forensic autopsy cohort unselected for breast symptoms: descriptive results from the Sisyphus study

Sidiropoulou, Z.; Santos, C.

2026-05-12 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.05.07.26352434 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale and ObjectivesPublished estimates of benign breast disease (BBD) are derived mainly from clinical, surgical, screening-recall, or reduction-mammoplasty series. Forensic autopsy cohorts can reduce referral and symptom-selection bias, although they are not necessarily representative of the whole living population. We describe imaging-detected benign breast findings in the Sisyphus forensic autopsy cohort. Materials and MethodsConsecutive medico-legal autopsies of individuals aged 40 years or older were prospectively evaluated over a multi-year period at a medico-legal autopsy service in Portugal. Bilateral breast specimens obtained by subcutaneous modified radical mastectomy were examined with specimen digital mammography and ultrasonography. Findings were classified according to BI-RADS terminology. Lesions requiring tissue diagnosis in the post-mortem protocol underwent wire-guided or direct excisional biopsy. Female cadavers were analysed as the primary cohort; male cadavers were analysed separately as an exploratory subgroup. Proportions are reported with exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ResultsThe cohort included 291 cadavers: 217 women and 74 men. Among female breast specimens, 236/434 were BI-RADS 1 (54.4%; 95% CI, 49.6-59.1), 189/434 were BI-RADS 2 (43.5%; 95% CI, 38.8-48.4), and 8/434 were protocol-sampled suspicious findings (1.8%; 95% CI, 0.8-3.6). At the cadaver level, 99/217 women had at least one benign imaging finding (45.6%; 95% CI, 38.9-52.5). Mammographic benign findings were present in 91/217 women (41.9%; 95% CI, 35.3-48.8), dominated by calcifications; ultrasonographic benign findings were present in 51/217 (23.5%; 95% CI, 18.0-29.7), most often simple cysts and duct ectasia. Plasma cell mastitis-pattern calcifications were observed in 8/217 women (3.7%; 95% CI, 1.6-7.1). Male benign findings were less frequent (9/74, 12.2%; 95% CI, 5.7-21.8) and were dominated by benign lymph-node variants. All nine protocol-sampled lesions were benign at histology. Clinical breast examination identified 5/8 protocol-sampled female lesions (62.5%; 95% CI, 24.5-91.5). ConclusionIn this forensic autopsy cohort unselected for breast symptoms, benign imaging findings were common in women aged 40 years or older and less frequent in men. The results provide descriptive post-mortem imaging reference data, but lesion-specific estimates, especially rare entities, should be interpreted with caution because of small numerators, the older age profile, limited clinical history, and the original cancer-focused design of the Sisyphus study.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.0%
2
npj Breast Cancer
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.6%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.5%
5
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
7
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
10
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
11
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
14
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.2%
22
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
29
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%