Back

A clinically integrated, frameless human Neuropixels workflow

Layard Horsfall, H.; Toma, A. K.; Watkins, L.; Akram, H.; Marcus, H. J.; Stewart, A.; Chatburn, J.; Vanhoestenberghe, A.; Coughlin, B. F.; Paulk, A. C.; Cash, S. S.; Welkenhuysen, M.; Dutta, B.; Schaefer, A. T.; Kollo, M.; Muirhead, W.

2026-05-18 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.07.26351853 medRxiv
Show abstract

High-density electrophysiological recording using Neuropixels probes enables single-unit resolution of human neural activity. However, integrating these systems into clinical environments remains challenging. Reported human recordings have been limited to a few centres in the United States utilising variable regulatory, sterilisation and operative techniques. Here, we present human Neuropixels recordings under a nationally managed ethical and regulatory framework in the United Kingdom. We provide a reproducible roadmap to overcome regulatory and equipment constraints. Guided by the IDEAL Stage 2a (Development) framework, we established a frameless intraoperative workflow utilising manufacturer-sterilised probes and a commercially available, clinical-grade setup for Neuropixels insertion including micromanipulator and endoscope holder. We prospectively evaluated this workflow across six participants (mean age 62.5 years) undergoing elective ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Iterative failure-mitigation cycles successfully resolved key technical barriers, including neuronavigation interference and hardware instability. Assessed across three predefined endpoints (clinical safety, procedural timing, and neural data yield), the workflow achieved zero research-related adverse events and maintained a strict 30-minute procedural extension. Progressive technical refinements increased single-unit yield from 25 units during early development to 146 manually curated units. This approach provides a scalable, clinically integrated workflow to safely perform high-density electrophysiology in routine neurosurgical environments.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.8%
3
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
5
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
6
Epilepsia
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
7
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Brain Stimulation
125 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Med
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
24
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
30
MethodsX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%