Back

Optimal Strategies for Signal Sending and Perception in Volatile-mediated Within-Plant Signaling against Herbivory

Kudo, S. N.; Iwakura, K.; Satake, A.

2026-05-11 ecology
10.64898/2026.05.06.723397 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) play a critical role in inducible plant defense as information-bearing airborne signals. Released from damaged tissues, HIPVs induce defense responses in undamaged parts of the plant, thereby reducing the risk of subsequent herbivore attack. Although both emission and perception are fundamental components of HIPV-mediated signaling, the co-evolutionary dynamics of these traits under herbivore-driven selection remain poorly understood. Here, we develop a mathematical model of within-plant signaling that explicitly incorporates both inducible signal emission and perception as evolving traits. Using the model, we derived the optimal level of HIPV signal emission and signal perception under successive herbivore attacks. Our results show that the strategy with both signal emission and signal perception, which underlies HIPV-mediated signaling, is favored only under intermediate levels of herbivory. Within this range, increasing herbivory frequency drives the joint evolution of reduced signal emission and enhanced sensitivity to released signal. Furthermore, extending the model to include perception-independent functions of HIPVs, such as the attraction of natural enemies and the deterrence of herbivores, expands the range of conditions under which HIPV-mediated signaling is favored. At the same time, it also allows the emergence of emission-only strategies lacking signal perception, suggesting the potential decoupling of the co-evolution of emission and responsiveness. These findings provide a theoretical framework for understanding how emission and perception jointly shape the evolution of volatile-mediated signaling systems in plants.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
25.6%
2
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
4
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
16
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
29
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%