Back

Auditory perceptual expertise: Amplitude modulation rate discrimination near the threshold for detection

Garcia Ruiz, T.; Sanes, D. H.

2026-05-11 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.05.06.723339 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many perceptual skills improve with a few days of training. However, weeks or months of practice may be required to reach a level of expertise on complex tasks (Watson, 1980). Here, we explored how gerbils attain expertise on a difficult task: amplitude modulation (AM) rate discrimination at very shallow AM depths, similar to the depths used during vocal communication. Using an appetitive Go-Nogo procedure, we first trained 6 gerbils to perform an AM discrimination task (Nogo: 4 Hz; Go: 4.25-10 Hz) at a depth of 0 dB (re: 100% depth). Animals were then trained to perform AM discrimination at successively shallower depths, from -3 to -18 dB, requiring an average of 5-10 days of practice to reach a performance metric of d[≥]1 for each depth. Finally, we determined that AM discrimination thresholds were nearly identical between 0 to -12 dB, and only slightly elevated at -15 dB. Improvements in performance were accompanied by a large reduction in response time during procedural learning, and a gradual reduction of response time during perceptual learning, even as AM depth became shallower (i.e., more difficult). The shallowest depth at which gerbils displayed peak performance on the AM discrimination task is similar to their lowest AM depth detection thresholds. These results suggest performance on challenging auditory perceptual tasks require prolonged practice, and is accompanied by increased automaticity (i.e., lower response time) that stabilizes once expertise is achieved.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.3%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.0%
3
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
17
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
19
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
27
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%