Back

SPIFEE - A pipeline for analyzing traces of live-cell fluorescence microscopy data

Hogendorn, C.; R. Aragon, I.; Dallon, S.; Batchelor, E.

2026-05-11 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.06.723263 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To properly respond to their environment, cells adjust the activity of key regulatory proteins and rates of gene expression. Methods to detect and quantify these forms of regulatory dynamics in living cells are of central importance for understanding cellular signaling events in both physiological and pathological conditions. Current technologies in this field make use of fluorescent probes to track cell signaling dynamics. Although these technologies have been used for decades, challenges remain. In particular, the segmentation, tracking, and interpretation of single cell dynamic data are time-consuming, prone to subjective errors, and often lacking in standardization across experiments. Here, we present SPIFEE, a data pipeline that uses experiment-dependent parameters to smooth noise and quantify key features of fluorescence data from time-lapse imaging studies. Processing data in this manner enhances and accelerates quantification of live-cell gene and protein expression, simplifies data analysis, and facilitates hypothesis generation. Author SummaryCells adjust protein activity and gene expression levels over time to respond to changes in their environment, a process referred to as cell signaling dynamics. Quantifying cell signaling dynamics in living cells often uses fluorescent probes, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) and its spectral variants, to track changes in gene expression or protein activity over time. Challenges inherent in analyzing fluorescence data from single cells stem from biological and experimental noise, time-consuming quantification, and subjective errors. To address these challenges, we developed a computational tool called Signal Processing and Integrated Feature Extraction (SPIFEE). The pipeline improves the quality of fluorescence data analysis by reducing noise and extracting signal features in a way that is both intuitive and objective. The pipeline provides more accurate, rapid, and unbiased quantification of time-lapse microscopy data.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
26.2%
2
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.9%
5
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.8%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 41%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
15
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
21
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%