Back

Millisecond nonlinear state changes during droplet coalescence identify therapeutic-antibody developability liabilities

St John, A. N.; Holland, J.; Lam, E. S.-H.; Lee, S.; Caramazza, P.; Thomas, A. N.; Shrivastava, S.

2026-05-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.05.06.723251 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Apohas Liquid State Intelligence Platform (LSIP) records ellipsometric waveforms from injections depositing sub-microgram quantities of antibody drop-by-drop onto a liquid reservoir. We previously showed that a behavioural feature extracted from the waveforms, VIBE1, identified antibodies carrying multiple biophysical liabilities in an industrial dataset of 71 monoclonal antibodies, and enriched for clinical failure across a larger dataset of 235 therapeutic antibodies [1]. Here, we use an auxiliary coalescence-sensor channel to decode VIBE1 by separating the coalescence event from its propagation through the substrate. The pertitration drop-to-drop standard deviation of pinch-off time,{sigma}{tau} , explains most of VIBE1s variance across the dataset (R2 = 0.92, n = 1182). High-speed imaging at 10,000 frames per second reveals that all imaged drops initially thin at the same Newtonian capillary-inertial rate while the neck remains wide. In drops from certain antibodies, the thinning bridge then decelerates as internal strain builds in the narrowing neck. This elasto-capillary stiffening response has a timescale{lambda} that decreases as pinch-off time{tau} i increases across the imaged set.{sigma}{tau} is therefore a readout of the antibodys propensity to undergo a transient gel-like stiffening response during coalescence, and that variability is what VIBE1 captures. The signal is concentration dependent, and absent in bovine serum albumin (BSA) tested at up to an order of magnitude higher molarity than the antibodies, despite BSA being a strongly surface-active globular protein. The instrument is configured so that complex behaviours of this kind appear in its recorded waveforms; the gel-like coalescence response we identify here is one such phenomenon.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.4%
2
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
5
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
6
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
ACS Photonics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Small Methods
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
10
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
13
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
15
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
19
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
22
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
24
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
25
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
26
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
27
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
29
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
30
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%