Back

Environmental Regulation and Gene-by-Environment Interaction Influence RAP1 Activity and its Impact on Gene Expression

Kalra, S.; Sanchez, G.; Stubin, A.; Le, A.; Bakshian, A.; Ortiz Diaz, B.; Mark, B. M.; Pena, C.; Parker, E.; Johnston, E.; Hsu, E.; Brangham, G.; Bala-Mehta, I.; Perez, L.; Milrod, M.; Stanten, M.; Nakamura, M.; Hwang, P.; Ptaszynska, S.; Cander, S.; Park, S.; Tan, T. L.; Zhou, Y.; Coolon, J.

2026-05-09 genomics
10.64898/2026.05.06.723246 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene-by-environment (GxE) interactions play a major role in shaping both phenotypic and molecular variation, with important implications for human health and disease. In this study, we used the Doxycycline (Dox) regulated, tetracycline-responsive (Tet-Off) promoter system to sequentially reduce or titrate gene expression levels of the essential yeast transcription factor Repressor Activator Protein 1 (RAP1) similar to a hypomorph allele series, across three distinct environments: Yeast Peptone Dextrose (YPD) media, YPD media with Heat Shock (HS), and Yeast Peptone Acetate (YPAC) media. We then performed RNA sequencing (RNA Seq) to assess global transcriptional responses to RAP1 reduction in these different growth environments. Our analysis first focused on the independent effects of varying RAP1 expression levels within and across environments. We then explored GxE interactions, revealing a subset of genes with significant consequences of reduced levels of RAP1 and environment-specific expression patterns. Notably, many genes exhibited opposite effects of RAP1 titration on gene expression when yeast were grown in YPAC media compared to YPD media and/or HS, suggesting environment-dependent regulatory architecture. This design reveals how cells integrate internal transcriptional and regulatory changes with external environmental cues, providing a deeper view of GxE architecture. Using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA), we identified co-regulated gene modules, and by combining this with transcription factor motif enrichment tests, our study identified candidate regulators driving their dynamics. Our findings demonstrate that gene regulatory networks can vary dramatically depending on the environmental context an organism experiences, which can then influence the specific phenotypes produced by a particular genetic perturbation. This illustrates the complexity of genotype-environment interactions and the importance of studying gene function in multiple environments to gain a truly comprehensive understanding of a genes sometimes numerous and diverse functions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.4%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Physiological Genomics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
27
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%