Back

Striatal FOXP2 is essential for stable vocal production in non-human primates

Liu, H.; Yao, Y.; Wang, C.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, K.; Yang, R.; Zhang, L.; Chang, L.; Xu, C.; Huang, J.; Gong, N.

2026-05-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.05.06.723125 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The transcription factor FOXP2 is the most well-known language-related gene in humans, yet its role in primate vocalization remains poorly understood. Here we report that knockdown of FOXP2 in the striatum markedly disrupts vocalization stability in the marmoset monkey, a valuable non-human primate model for studying vocal behavior. FOXP2 exhibited high expression in the marmoset striatum, especially during early development. Using the CRISPR-Cas12 system, we achieved specific in vivo editing of the FOXP2 gene and effective knockdown of FOXP2 protein expression in the marmoset striatum. Two neonatal marmosets received bilateral striatal injections of the gene-editing and control virus, respectively, and were raised together in the same family. In three such marmoset pairs, analysis of vocalizations recorded during 6-15 weeks post-injection revealed that striatal FOXP2 knockdown significantly altered vocal features and increased intra-individual variability in phee syllables--the most common marmoset vocalization, often produced repetitively as multi-syllable phee calls. Notably, in FOXP2-edited marmosets, acoustic alterations were minimal in the first syllable of phee calls but became progressively more pronounced in subsequent syllables, which exhibited a marked upward shift in the frequency spectrum over time with progressively steeper slopes. These temporal dynamics in vocal features reflect a reduction in the stability of continuous vocal production. In line with the known striatal functions in motor control, our findings provide the first evidence of FOXP2 in controlling vocalization in non-human primates, thereby opening new avenues for investigating the neural mechanisms underlying FOXP2 function.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.1%
2
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.0%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.7%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
13
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
27
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%