Back

A radial map of the budding yeast genome reveals novel organizational principles

Laenen, G.; Yip, W. H.; Baquero Perez, M.; Cournac, A.; Bienko, M.; Taddei, A.

2026-05-08 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.05.06.722996 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The eukaryotic genome is non-randomly organized within the nucleus, with positioning linked to function. Still, genome-wide radial maps are missing for the majority of experimental model systems. We adapted Genomic loci Positioning by Sequencing (GPSeq) to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, enabling high-resolution mapping along the nuclear center-periphery axis. GPSeq confirms known spatial features and shows that peripheral telomeres and centromeres impose long-range constraints extending up to 200 kb, restricting short chromosome arms from the nuclear interior. Telomere repositioning to the nuclear center, either artificially or during quiescence, reorganizes much of the genome through inward movement of sub telomeric regions and compensatory shifts of mid-arm chromatin outward. In quiescence, reduced centromere peripheral localization further alters genome organization. While transcription has a modest impact on radial positioning in all studied conditions, we uncover that in the absence of centromere or telomere constraints, GC-content functionally organizes chromatin in the nucleus. Graphical abstractThe budding yeast genome is spatially organized in a manner highly dependent on the positioning of centromeres (CENs) and telomeres (TELs). Anchoring of these chromosome landmarks constrains the positioning of adjacent chromatin up to 200 kb within the same radial zone. Beyond this range, genome organization is non-random, with processes like transcription and features such as GC- content associated with specific radial positions in the nucleus. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/722996v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@843adborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1343eb3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1009b03org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c10245_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.5%
2
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.7%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
5
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 13%
3.9%
10
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
13
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
15
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
16
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
20
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
24
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
26
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Genes & Development
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%