Back

Frequency-domain identification of photosynthetic regulation under fluctuating light

Nedbal, L.

2026-05-11 plant biology
10.64898/2026.05.06.722921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plant photosynthesis operates under naturally fluctuating light, yet its dynamic responses across timescales remain incompletely understood. Here, we apply sinusoidal light modulation as a controlled periodic input and analyze the response in the frequency domain, enabling quantitative system identification of photosynthetic dynamics. Using a minimal biochemical model of photosynthetic electron transport and regulation, we show that the system exhibits distinct dynamic regimes separated by a characteristic timescale of approximately 10 s. In the high-frequency domain, the response is governed by constitutive processes and reflects steady-state properties such as the plastoquinone redox state. In the low-frequency domain, regulatory feedback dominates, particularly non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), which modulates both the amplitude and phase of the response. For small-amplitude perturbations, the system behaves linearly and can be characterized using transfer functions and Bode plots. We show that key physiological parameters, including relaxation times and regulatory gains, can be extracted directly from frequency-response features such as phase maxima and gain transitions. In the nonlinear regime, large-amplitude oscillations generate higher-harmonic structure and alter time-averaged photosynthetic performance relative to constant illumination. We further introduce the concept of regulation fingerprints, defined as ratios of transfer functions between regulated and unregulated systems. These fingerprints reveal distinct spectral signatures of fast (PsbS-mediated) and slow (zeaxanthin-dependent) NPQ processes, enabling their quantitative separation. Together, these results establish frequency-domain analysis as a framework for probing and identifying the dynamic regulation of photosynthesis under fluctuating light, with direct applicability to non-invasive measurements in laboratory and field conditions.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 5%
18.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.4%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
9
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.9%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
14
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.6%
20
Photosynthesis Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.5%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
23
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%