Back

Building an open ecosystem for molecular neuroimaging: standards and tools from the OpenNeuroPET initiative

Ganz, M.; Norgaard, M.; Pernet, C.; Matheson, G. J.; Galassi, A.; Ceballos, E. G.; Wighton, P.; Bilgel, M.; Eierud, C.; Gonzalez-Escamilla, G.; Buckholtz, J.; Blair, R.; Markiewicz, C. J.; Hardcastle, N.; Greve, D. N.; Thomas, A. G.; Poldrack, R. A.; Calhoun, V. D.; Innis, R. B.; Knudsen, G. M.

2026-05-09 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.05.06.722876 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Molecular neuroimaging with positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) enables quantification of specific molecular targets in the living brain. Despite its scientific impact, molecular neuroimaging research has historically faced challenges due to high costs, small sample sizes, laboratory-specific analysis pipelines, and limited large-scale data sharing. These factors have hindered reproducibility and the broader reuse of valuable PET datasets. The OpenNeuroPET initiative was established to address these barriers by developing standards, infrastructure, and open-source tools for organizing, sharing, and analyzing molecular neuroimaging data. Through collaborations across Europe and North America, OpenNeuroPET has supported the PET extension of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (PET-BIDS), providing a standardized framework for PET datasets and metadata. Building on PET-BIDS, tools such as PET2BIDS, ezBIDS, and BIDSCoin facilitate data conversion and curation. In parallel, OpenNeuro now hosts PET-BIDS datasets for open sharing, while complementary platforms such as PublicnEUro enable GDPR-compliant controlled access. Emerging open-source workflows and BIDS applications further support automated, reproducible PET preprocessing and quantitative analysis, promoting harmonized processing across centers. Together, these developments mark an important step toward an open molecular neuroimaging ecosystem in which datasets, software, and workflows can be transparently shared, reused, and scaled for collaborative research.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
18.6%
2
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
7
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.1%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%