Back

DNA supercoiling modulates bZIP transcription factor/DNA interaction

Valenti, A.; Mattossovich, R.; Merlo, R.; Schifino, G.; Sandomenico, A.; Widersten, M.; Calio, A.; Peters, J.; Pastore, A.; Parracino, A.

2026-05-07 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.05.06.722604 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA topology is a key regulator of chromatin structure and transcription, yet its direct role in transcription factor recognition remains unclear. Here, we investigate how distinct DNA topological states modulate binding of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae bZIP transcription factor GCN4 using topologically defined plasmids. By combining, complementary biochemical approaches, including Bio-Layer Interferometry applied here for the first time to topology-dependent protein-DNA interactions, we show that DNA supercoiling directly reshapes GCN4-DNA recognition. Positively supercoiled DNA forms more stable and persistent complexes, whereas negatively supercoiled DNA retains greater conformational heterogeneity. To interpret these effects, we performed multiscale molecular simulations. Coarse-grained simulations of plasmids recapitulate the global topology-dependent trends observed experimentally, while matched minicircle models reproduce the same behaviour at the local scale. In strong agreement with experimental data, simulations reveal that DNA topology modulates the conformational ensemble of the GCN4 basic region. Overall, positively supercoiled DNA promotes a more ordered binding mode and localized protein distribution, whereas negatively supercoiled DNA supports increased structural plasticity. These findings identify DNA topology as an active determinant of transcription factor recognition and provide a multiscale framework linking global DNA mechanics to local protein-DNA interactions. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=113 SRC="FIGDIR/small/722604v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18f8ba9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11a395dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ac093borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@923212_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.2%
2
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.3%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.6%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.5%
17
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.1%
19
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%