Back

Outdoor attractive targeted sugar bait Phase III trials for malaria control in Kenya, Mali, and Zambia: An individual participant data meta-analysis

Ashton, R.; McDermott, D. P.; Kane, F.; Sarrassat, S.; Harris, A.; Fornadel, C.; Wagman, J.; Chanda, J.; Littrell, M.; ter Kuile, F. O.; Samuels, A. M.; Ochomo, E.; Churcher, T. S.; Biggs, J.; Staedke, S. G.; Doumbia, S.; Kleinschmidt, I.; Yukich, J.; Eisele, T. P.

2026-05-10 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352614 medRxiv
Show abstract

Attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSB) are a potential new class of vector control tool that act through an "attract and kill" mechanism on mosquitoes. We conducted a meta-analysis using data from three large-scale Phase III trials of the Westham Sarabi v1.2 ATSB (0.11% dinotefuran) conducted in Kenya, Mali, and Zambia, to determine the effect of the intervention on clinical malaria incidence in children, Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence, and dominant vector species parity, abundance, landing rate, and sporozoite positivity. The Sarabi ATSB was deployed on exterior walls at the rate of two per residential structure. Aggregated and individual-level meta-analyses were completed for each of the six trial outcomes, comprising 6981 person-years of follow-up for clinical malaria incidence (primary epidemiological outcome) and 19443 Anopheles for parity assessment (primary entomological outcome). Post-hoc analyses included assessment of dose-response relationships between coverage-adjusted intervention density and clinical malaria incidence. There were no statistically significant differences between arms in any of the epidemiological or entomological outcomes. There was statistically significant evidence of a 19% reduction in clinical malaria incidence for every 10 bait stations per hectare increase observed in spatial density (IRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.89, p<0.001), provided that the ATSB were in good condition. This finding suggests that there may be deployment approaches or dosing strategies under which ATSB tools could be efficacious, although threshold spatial densities could not be determined from available data. This meta-analysis furthermore highlights important recommendations for future cluster-randomized trials of vector control interventions, including conducting comprehensive baseline data collection to identify cluster outliers or sites with differences in vector bionomics, and collecting a limited set of entomological outcomes in all trial clusters to ensure an adequately powered and balanced analysis of entomological effects.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Malaria Journal
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.1%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
6
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.9%
9
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.9%
13
Parasites & Vectors
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 49%
0.5%
22
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%