Back

HiFiMAP: High-resolution fast identity-by-descent mapping test

Guo, B.; Naseri, A.; Xie, Z.; Sarnowski, C.; Zhi, D.; Chen, H.

2026-05-17 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352570 medRxiv
Show abstract

Although traditional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous loci, they often ignore phased haplotype information. Identity-by-descent (IBD) mapping captures these extended haplotypic effects by modeling shared ancestral segments. However, standard statistical mapping of these segments scales poorly with biobank-sized cohorts and short IBD segments that capture older evolutionary events. To overcome this computational bottleneck, existing scalable IBD mapping frameworks aggregate shared segments into fixed sliding windows. While computationally efficient, this window-based approach generates association signals at a low resolution that often span hundreds of kilobases. To address this issue, here we present a novel High-resolution Fast IBD Mapping test (HiFiMAP) that takes snapshots of IBD segments at the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) level resolution. Simulation studies confirm that HiFiMAP maintains well-controlled type I error rates and exhibits superior statistical power for detecting rare variants and haplotype effects using short IBD segments. In a UK Biobank (UKB) benchmark (N=407,681), HiFiMAP mapped 640,899 SNPs at 1.92 CPU seconds per test, massively outperforming existing window-based methods (95.2 CPU seconds per test for 3,403 windows). Furthermore, applied to high-dimensional brain imaging phenotypes (N~36,000), HiFiMAP identified five novel associations previously undetected by standard GWAS approaches, including key central nervous system regulators like NR2F1 and NSF/WNT3. By refining large testing windows into highly specific genomic variants, HiFiMAP empowers biobank-scale, SNP-level resolution mapping to accurately pinpoint complex trait architectures.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.