Back

Generating synthetic tau-PET scans in Alzheimer's disease from MRI, blood biomarkers and demographics with deep learning

Karlsson, L.; Strandberg, O.; Smith, R.; Tang, W.; Arvidsson, I.; Astrom, K.; Oliviera Hauer, K.; Janelidze, S.; Stomrud, E.; Palmqvist, S.; Verghese, P. B.; Braunstein, J. B.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, ; PREVENT-AD Research Group, ; Klein, G.; Shcherbinin, S.; Jagust, W. J.; Villeneuve, S.; La Joie, R.; Rabinovici, G. D.; Mattsson-Carlgren, N.; Vogel, J. W.; Hansson, O.

2026-05-07 neurology
10.64898/2026.05.06.26352540 medRxiv
Show abstract

Tau protein aggregation in the brain is a hallmark of Alzheimers disease (AD). Positron emission tomography (PET) is the only in vivo method to visualize tau pathology and estimate both its burden and regional distribution, but the use of tau-PET is constrained by high cost and limited accessibility. Here, we develop a deep learning model to synthesize tau-PET scans from more accessible data: structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), demographics, and when available, blood biomarkers. We included 5,191 participants across the AD continuum or with another neurological disorder from 13 cohorts (mean age 70 years, 51% female) and optimized a 3D U-Net neural network with residual and attention units for this task. In held-out test data, synthetic tau-PET reliably modeled tau burden, with correlations of R=0.77-0.86 with true tau-PET across individuals in common AD regions of interest. Spatial similarity between synthetic and true tau-PET was likewise high, with mean regional correlation of R=0.75. Synthetic scans also captured clinically meaningful prognostic information comparable to true tau-PET, including distinction between early (HR=12, p<0.001) and late (HR=45, p<0.001) stages of tau accumulation. These findings demonstrate that clinically informative synthetic tau-PET scans can be generated from widely available modalities using deep learning, potentially offering a scalable and cost-effective approach for estimating tau AD pathology in the brain.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.4%
3
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.3%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 30%
6.3%
7
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
11
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
17
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
21
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
28
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%